Restrictive and non-restrictive modification of proprial lemmas

Lieven Vandelanotte, Peter Willemse

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journal/une revueArticleRevue par des pairs


The notion of rigid designation has become a widely accepted, if not unproblematic one in connection with the function of proper names. In this paper, some less 'rigid' uses of proper names will be looked at. Proprial lemmas - that is to say, words that function prototypically as proper names - may sometimes function as common nouns rather than as proper names, for instance in There are two Johns in my class. On the other hand, proprial lemmas may also receive some amount of modification without acquiring the 'categorizing' function of common nouns, but rather retaining the rigid, unique designation associated with proper names, as in An angry Blair left the meeting yesterday. The aim of the present paper is twofold: (i) to offer a workable terminological and conceptual framework to deal with these different constructional schemata involving proprial lemmas, and (ii) to propose a tentative classification of both 'restrictive' and 'non-restrictive' modification of proprial lemmas into distinct subtypes. In the end, it is hoped, these endeavours may shed a new light on the nature and potential of proper names and proprial lemmas.
langue originaleAnglais
Pages (de - à)9-36
Nombre de pages28
Numéro de publication1
Etat de la publicationPublié - 2002

Empreinte digitale

Examiner les sujets de recherche de « Restrictive and non-restrictive modification of proprial lemmas ». Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte digitale unique.

Contient cette citation