Restrictive and non-restrictive modification of proprial lemmas

Lieven Vandelanotte, Peter Willemse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The notion of rigid designation has become a widely accepted, if not unproblematic one in connection with the function of proper names. In this paper, some less 'rigid' uses of proper names will be looked at. Proprial lemmas - that is to say, words that function prototypically as proper names - may sometimes function as common nouns rather than as proper names, for instance in There are two Johns in my class. On the other hand, proprial lemmas may also receive some amount of modification without acquiring the 'categorizing' function of common nouns, but rather retaining the rigid, unique designation associated with proper names, as in An angry Blair left the meeting yesterday. The aim of the present paper is twofold: (i) to offer a workable terminological and conceptual framework to deal with these different constructional schemata involving proprial lemmas, and (ii) to propose a tentative classification of both 'restrictive' and 'non-restrictive' modification of proprial lemmas into distinct subtypes. In the end, it is hoped, these endeavours may shed a new light on the nature and potential of proper names and proprial lemmas.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-36
Number of pages28
JournalWORD
Volume53
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Proper Names
Lemma
Common Noun
Rigid Designation
Conceptual Framework
Constructional Schema

Cite this

Vandelanotte, Lieven ; Willemse, Peter. / Restrictive and non-restrictive modification of proprial lemmas. In: WORD. 2002 ; Vol. 53, No. 1. pp. 9-36.
@article{5f27896e8209425a8ce596e33c2de962,
title = "Restrictive and non-restrictive modification of proprial lemmas",
abstract = "The notion of rigid designation has become a widely accepted, if not unproblematic one in connection with the function of proper names. In this paper, some less 'rigid' uses of proper names will be looked at. Proprial lemmas - that is to say, words that function prototypically as proper names - may sometimes function as common nouns rather than as proper names, for instance in There are two Johns in my class. On the other hand, proprial lemmas may also receive some amount of modification without acquiring the 'categorizing' function of common nouns, but rather retaining the rigid, unique designation associated with proper names, as in An angry Blair left the meeting yesterday. The aim of the present paper is twofold: (i) to offer a workable terminological and conceptual framework to deal with these different constructional schemata involving proprial lemmas, and (ii) to propose a tentative classification of both 'restrictive' and 'non-restrictive' modification of proprial lemmas into distinct subtypes. In the end, it is hoped, these endeavours may shed a new light on the nature and potential of proper names and proprial lemmas.",
author = "Lieven Vandelanotte and Peter Willemse",
year = "2002",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "9--36",
journal = "WORD",
issn = "0043-7956",
publisher = "International Linguistic Association",
number = "1",

}

Restrictive and non-restrictive modification of proprial lemmas. / Vandelanotte, Lieven; Willemse, Peter.

In: WORD, Vol. 53, No. 1, 2002, p. 9-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Restrictive and non-restrictive modification of proprial lemmas

AU - Vandelanotte, Lieven

AU - Willemse, Peter

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - The notion of rigid designation has become a widely accepted, if not unproblematic one in connection with the function of proper names. In this paper, some less 'rigid' uses of proper names will be looked at. Proprial lemmas - that is to say, words that function prototypically as proper names - may sometimes function as common nouns rather than as proper names, for instance in There are two Johns in my class. On the other hand, proprial lemmas may also receive some amount of modification without acquiring the 'categorizing' function of common nouns, but rather retaining the rigid, unique designation associated with proper names, as in An angry Blair left the meeting yesterday. The aim of the present paper is twofold: (i) to offer a workable terminological and conceptual framework to deal with these different constructional schemata involving proprial lemmas, and (ii) to propose a tentative classification of both 'restrictive' and 'non-restrictive' modification of proprial lemmas into distinct subtypes. In the end, it is hoped, these endeavours may shed a new light on the nature and potential of proper names and proprial lemmas.

AB - The notion of rigid designation has become a widely accepted, if not unproblematic one in connection with the function of proper names. In this paper, some less 'rigid' uses of proper names will be looked at. Proprial lemmas - that is to say, words that function prototypically as proper names - may sometimes function as common nouns rather than as proper names, for instance in There are two Johns in my class. On the other hand, proprial lemmas may also receive some amount of modification without acquiring the 'categorizing' function of common nouns, but rather retaining the rigid, unique designation associated with proper names, as in An angry Blair left the meeting yesterday. The aim of the present paper is twofold: (i) to offer a workable terminological and conceptual framework to deal with these different constructional schemata involving proprial lemmas, and (ii) to propose a tentative classification of both 'restrictive' and 'non-restrictive' modification of proprial lemmas into distinct subtypes. In the end, it is hoped, these endeavours may shed a new light on the nature and potential of proper names and proprial lemmas.

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 9

EP - 36

JO - WORD

JF - WORD

SN - 0043-7956

IS - 1

ER -