TY - JOUR
T1 - Put another way. Reformulation as a window into discourse and interaction in LSFB (French Belgian Sign Language)
AU - Meurant, Laurence
N1 - Funding Information:
Laurence Meurant is Research Associate for the F.R.S-FNRS in Belgium. This research has been conducted with the support of the F.R.S-FNRS Research Credit ref. CDR J.0131.21 awarded to the author. Acknowledgements
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 John Benjamins Publishing Company.
PY - 2022/12/31
Y1 - 2022/12/31
N2 - Reformulation involves saying something again in a different way. Because of its metalinguistic nature (Rabatel 2017), combined with its general aim of clarifying the utterance, we propose to consider the act of reformulation as offering a window to the way interlocutors process and adjust themselves and their utterances in their social language practices. More specifically, this study proposes a set of four analytical criteria to characterize interlocutors’ investment in discourse and interaction via the observation of their use of reformulations. These criteria concern the frequency of reformulations within a production, the proportion of self- and other-reformulations (Güllich and Kotschi 1987), the type of adjustment that the act of reformulation seeks to achieve (Authier-Revuz 1995) and the type of semiotic strategies used, namely descriptive, indicative and depictive ways of meaning making (Clark 1996; Ferrara and Hodge 2018). The paper draws on the exploratory analysis of the productions of deaf LSFB signers extracted from the LSFB Corpus. It illustrates how describing the reformulations according to the proposed criteria, reveals distinctions between different patterns of pragmatic attitude and involvement in discourse and interaction. This approach opens new avenues for the pragmatic descriptions of LSFB and signed discourses in general.
AB - Reformulation involves saying something again in a different way. Because of its metalinguistic nature (Rabatel 2017), combined with its general aim of clarifying the utterance, we propose to consider the act of reformulation as offering a window to the way interlocutors process and adjust themselves and their utterances in their social language practices. More specifically, this study proposes a set of four analytical criteria to characterize interlocutors’ investment in discourse and interaction via the observation of their use of reformulations. These criteria concern the frequency of reformulations within a production, the proportion of self- and other-reformulations (Güllich and Kotschi 1987), the type of adjustment that the act of reformulation seeks to achieve (Authier-Revuz 1995) and the type of semiotic strategies used, namely descriptive, indicative and depictive ways of meaning making (Clark 1996; Ferrara and Hodge 2018). The paper draws on the exploratory analysis of the productions of deaf LSFB signers extracted from the LSFB Corpus. It illustrates how describing the reformulations according to the proposed criteria, reveals distinctions between different patterns of pragmatic attitude and involvement in discourse and interaction. This approach opens new avenues for the pragmatic descriptions of LSFB and signed discourses in general.
KW - discourse
KW - interaction
KW - language heterogeneity
KW - LSFB (French Belgian Sign Language)
KW - reformulation
KW - semiotic complexity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166439116&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1075/bjl.00074.meu
DO - 10.1075/bjl.00074.meu
M3 - Article
SN - 0774-5141
VL - 36
SP - 145
EP - 178
JO - Belgian Journal of Linguistics
JF - Belgian Journal of Linguistics
IS - 1
ER -