Adoption of in-store mobile payment: Are perceived risk and convenience the only drivers?

Gwarlann de Kerviler, Nathalie T M Demoulin, Pietro Zidda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Smartphones are changing the way consumers shop, even in brick-and-mortar settings. This study explores consumers' adoption of proximity mobile payment technology (p-m-payment), which enables them to pay with their smartphones for purchases in a physical store. With a perceived value perspective, the authors identify utilitarian, hedonic, and social benefits and financial and privacy risks as key drivers. They also investigate differences compared with the drivers of more familiar mobile shopping usages and highlight the role of experience. The paper discusses implications for both mobile and channel research and recommendations to help retailers take advantage of p-m-payment technology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)334-344
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Retailing and Consumer Services
Volume31
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2016

Fingerprint

Mobile payment
Perceived risk
Proximity
Purchase
Social benefits
Privacy
Retailers
Perceived value
Shopping

Keywords

  • In-store experience
  • Perceived value
  • Proximity mobile payment

Cite this

@article{fec3bdb3a3114169bbb755d37b264c4a,
title = "Adoption of in-store mobile payment: Are perceived risk and convenience the only drivers?",
abstract = "Smartphones are changing the way consumers shop, even in brick-and-mortar settings. This study explores consumers' adoption of proximity mobile payment technology (p-m-payment), which enables them to pay with their smartphones for purchases in a physical store. With a perceived value perspective, the authors identify utilitarian, hedonic, and social benefits and financial and privacy risks as key drivers. They also investigate differences compared with the drivers of more familiar mobile shopping usages and highlight the role of experience. The paper discusses implications for both mobile and channel research and recommendations to help retailers take advantage of p-m-payment technology.",
keywords = "In-store experience, Perceived value, Proximity mobile payment",
author = "{de Kerviler}, Gwarlann and Demoulin, {Nathalie T M} and Pietro Zidda",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.04.011",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "334--344",
journal = "Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services",
issn = "0969-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Adoption of in-store mobile payment : Are perceived risk and convenience the only drivers? / de Kerviler, Gwarlann; Demoulin, Nathalie T M; Zidda, Pietro.

In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 31, 01.07.2016, p. 334-344.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adoption of in-store mobile payment

T2 - Are perceived risk and convenience the only drivers?

AU - de Kerviler, Gwarlann

AU - Demoulin, Nathalie T M

AU - Zidda, Pietro

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Smartphones are changing the way consumers shop, even in brick-and-mortar settings. This study explores consumers' adoption of proximity mobile payment technology (p-m-payment), which enables them to pay with their smartphones for purchases in a physical store. With a perceived value perspective, the authors identify utilitarian, hedonic, and social benefits and financial and privacy risks as key drivers. They also investigate differences compared with the drivers of more familiar mobile shopping usages and highlight the role of experience. The paper discusses implications for both mobile and channel research and recommendations to help retailers take advantage of p-m-payment technology.

AB - Smartphones are changing the way consumers shop, even in brick-and-mortar settings. This study explores consumers' adoption of proximity mobile payment technology (p-m-payment), which enables them to pay with their smartphones for purchases in a physical store. With a perceived value perspective, the authors identify utilitarian, hedonic, and social benefits and financial and privacy risks as key drivers. They also investigate differences compared with the drivers of more familiar mobile shopping usages and highlight the role of experience. The paper discusses implications for both mobile and channel research and recommendations to help retailers take advantage of p-m-payment technology.

KW - In-store experience

KW - Perceived value

KW - Proximity mobile payment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964915590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.04.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.04.011

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84964915590

VL - 31

SP - 334

EP - 344

JO - Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services

JF - Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services

SN - 0969-6989

ER -