@article{38732a42d132476d9ce89e9ec0d6e60d,
title = "An ecotoxicological view on neurotoxicity assessment",
abstract = "The numbers of potential neurotoxicants in the environment are raising and pose a great risk for humans and the environment. Currently neurotoxicity assessment is mostly performed to predict and prevent harm to human populations. Despite all the efforts invested in the last years in developing novel in vitro or in silico test systems, in vivo tests with rodents are still the only accepted test for neurotoxicity risk assessment in Europe. Despite an increasing number of reports of species showing altered behaviour, neurotoxicity assessment for species in the environment is not required and therefore mostly not performed. Considering the increasing numbers of environmental contaminants with potential neurotoxic potential, eco-neurotoxicity should be also considered in risk assessment. In order to do so novel test systems are needed that can cope with species differences within ecosystems. In the field, online-biomonitoring systems using behavioural information could be used to detect neurotoxic effects and effect-directed analyses could be applied to identify the neurotoxicants causing the effect. Additionally, toxic pressure calculations in combination with mixture modelling could use environmental chemical monitoring data to predict adverse effects and prioritize pollutants for laboratory testing. Cheminformatics based on computational toxicological data from in vitro and in vivo studies could help to identify potential neurotoxicants. An array of in vitro assays covering different modes of action could be applied to screen compounds for neurotoxicity. The selection of in vitro assays could be guided by AOPs relevant for eco-neurotoxicity. In order to be able to perform risk assessment for eco-neurotoxicity, methods need to focus on the most sensitive species in an ecosystem. A test battery using species from different trophic levels might be the best approach. To implement eco-neurotoxicity assessment into European risk assessment, cheminformatics and in vitro screening tests could be used as first approach to identify eco-neurotoxic pollutants. In a second step, a small species test battery could be applied to assess the risks of ecosystems.",
keywords = "AOP, Behaviour, Computational toxicity, Eco-neurotoxicity, Ecological, EDA, Neurotoxicity, REACH, Species",
author = "Legradi, {J. B.} and {Di Paolo}, C. and Kraak, {M. H.S.} and {van der Geest}, {H. G.} and Schymanski, {E. L.} and Williams, {A. J.} and Dingemans, {M. M.L.} and R. Massei and W. Brack and X. Cousin and Begout, {M. L.} and {van der Oost}, R. and A. Carion and V. Suarez-Ulloa and F. Silvestre and Escher, {B. I.} and M. Engwall and G. Nil{\'e}n and Keiter, {S. H.} and D. Pollet and P. Waldmann and C. Kienle and I. Werner and Haigis, {A. C.} and D. Knapen and L. Vergauwen and M. Spehr and W. Schulz and W. Busch and D. Leuthold and S. Scholz and {vom Berg}, {C. M.} and N. Basu and Murphy, {C. A.} and A. Lampert and J. Kuckelkorn and T. Grummt and H. Hollert",
note = "Funding Information: We thank the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) founded project NeuroBox and the Norman Network (http://www.norman‑netwo rk.com/) for funding this study. Additionally, this work was conducted within the framework of the Joint Research Program of the Dutch Water companies (BTO2018‑2023) and the SOLUTIONS project (European Union{\textquoteright}s Seventh Framework Program for research, technological development and demonstra‑ tion under Grant Agreement No. 603437). Henner Hollert is Editor‑in‑Chief of this Journal. Funding Information: JL, CDP and HH conceptualized the manuscript. JL and CDP edited the manuscript and coordinated the contributions. MHSK, HGvanderG, ELS, AJW, MMLD, RM, WB, XC, M-LB, RvanderO, AC, VS-U, FS, BIE, ME, GN, SHK, DP, PW, CK, IW, A-CH, DK, LV, MS, WS, WB, DL, SS, CvomB, NB, CM, JK, TG and HH contributed specific aspects to the manuscript and improved the manuscript content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. We thank the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) founded project NeuroBox and the Norman Network (http://www.norman-network.com/) for funding this study. Additionally, this work was conducted within the framework of the Joint Research Program of the Dutch Water companies (BTO2018-2023) and the SOLUTIONS project (European Union{\textquoteright}s Seventh Framework Program for research, technological development and demonstration under Grant Agreement No. 603437). Henner Hollert is Editor-in-Chief of this Journal. The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Not applicable; presented information is based on previously published data only. Not applicable. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Not applicable. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018, The Author(s). Copyright: Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2018",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/s12302-018-0173-x",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "46",
journal = "Environmental Sciences Europe",
issn = "2190-4707",
publisher = "SpringerOpen",
number = "1",
}