Towards pest outbreak predictions: Are models supported by field monitoring the new hope?

Nicolás Bono Rosselló, Luca Rossini, Stefano Speranza, Emanuele Garone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Physiologically-based models are the core of Decision Support Systems (DSS) for insect pest and disease control in cultivated fields. However, the large-scale use of DSS remains scarce and limited, despite the continuous update and formulation of new models by the literature. The main reason behind this lack of real-world use relates to the purely descriptive approach of these models, which are usually validated a posteriori. The major limiting factors that preclude the use of these tools for prediction purposes are their dependence on time zero and initial abundance to start the simulations. In this study, we present a theoretical framework that includes field monitoring data as an active part of a pest population density model simulation, which helps to overcome these obstacles. More specifically, we propose the application of an estimator scheme in the form of an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) to a revised physiologically-based model from the literature. In the paper, we carry out a preliminary test of the theoretical framework applied to the case of Drosophila suzukii. This case study shows that the dependence of the simulations on the initial conditions and time zero is strongly reduced by using the EKF. Overall, the outcome of this research indicates that an estimator scheme is a necessary step to move from description to prediction in the pest population modelling field.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102310
JournalEcological Informatics
Volume78
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

Keywords

  • Decision support systems
  • Estimation update
  • Integrated pest management
  • Pest monitoring
  • Physiologically-based models
  • Precision agriculture
  • Predictive models

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Towards pest outbreak predictions: Are models supported by field monitoring the new hope?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this