Should we care about small-scale deliberation? A systematic literature review of minipublic consequences

Vincent Jacquet, Ramon van der Does

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un événement scientifique (non publié)ArticleRevue par des pairs

14 Téléchargements (Pure)


The early 1980s marked the start of deliberative democracy both in theory and in practice. Not only did political theorists shift their attention towards models of deliberative democracy, deliberative democratic innovations such as citizens’ juries, deliberative polls and citizens' assemblies were implemented. In the following decades, these innovations commonly referred to as minipublics would become a celebrated type of institution to involve citizens in the democratic process and to cure the malaise of representative government. The organization of such small-scale gatherings in which citizens discuss public issues by now has become widespread and for some is even a lucrative undertaking. But what do they actually achieve? What are their actual effects on the functioning of political systems? Are minipublics viable democratic innovations? In this article, we seek to contribute to this agenda by systematically reviewing the literature on the consequences of deliberative minipublics.
langue originaleAnglais
Etat de la publicationPublié - 2018
Modification externeOui
EvénementKongress der Deutschen Vereinigung für Politikwissenschaft - Frankfurt am Main, Allemagne
Durée: 25 sept. 201828 sept. 2018

Une conférence

Une conférenceKongress der Deutschen Vereinigung für Politikwissenschaft
La villeFrankfurt am Main

Empreinte digitale

Examiner les sujets de recherche de « Should we care about small-scale deliberation? A systematic literature review of minipublic consequences ». Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte digitale unique.

Contient cette citation