Discerning the causes of a decline in a common European fish, the roach (Rutilus rutilus L.): A modelling approach

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journal/une revueArticle

Résumé

Stock assessment of roach (Rutilus rutilus) in the river Meuse (Belgium), based on two decades of research, indicated a sudden stock decline since the early 2010s. While roach was very abundant during the 1990s and beginning of the 2000s with densities estimated around 3000-3700fishha-1, densities dropped below 400fishha-1 since 2010. A drop in primary production since 2005 and an increase in predation pressure by the Great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) between 2000 and 2006 are listed among potential explanations. In the present study, three scenarios were explored using an age-structured Leslie matrix to investigate if bottom-up control (phytoplankton driven), top-down control (predation driven) or a combination of both can explain the observed decline of roach stock. Including only a phytoplankton-dependent reduction of carrying capacity into the model (i.e. bottom-up control) accurately predicted the observed densities. If only predation by wintering populations of Great Cormorant was considered, the model did not predict the observed decline in roach stock. Combining top-down and bottom-up effects into the model resulted in a comparable fit as when including bottom-up effects alone. Taken together, our results suggest that roach decline is mainly driven by phytoplankton decline.

langue originaleAnglais
Pages (de - à)92-100
Nombre de pages9
journalEcological Modelling
Volume322
Les DOIs
étatPublié - 24 févr. 2016

Empreinte digitale

bottom-up control
predation
phytoplankton
fish
modeling
top-down control
stock assessment
carrying capacity
primary production
matrix
river
effect

Citer ceci

@article{23ed64ab3ff14c8aa8e8fb88798f0d24,
title = "Discerning the causes of a decline in a common European fish, the roach (Rutilus rutilus L.): A modelling approach",
abstract = "Stock assessment of roach (Rutilus rutilus) in the river Meuse (Belgium), based on two decades of research, indicated a sudden stock decline since the early 2010s. While roach was very abundant during the 1990s and beginning of the 2000s with densities estimated around 3000-3700fishha-1, densities dropped below 400fishha-1 since 2010. A drop in primary production since 2005 and an increase in predation pressure by the Great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) between 2000 and 2006 are listed among potential explanations. In the present study, three scenarios were explored using an age-structured Leslie matrix to investigate if bottom-up control (phytoplankton driven), top-down control (predation driven) or a combination of both can explain the observed decline of roach stock. Including only a phytoplankton-dependent reduction of carrying capacity into the model (i.e. bottom-up control) accurately predicted the observed densities. If only predation by wintering populations of Great Cormorant was considered, the model did not predict the observed decline in roach stock. Combining top-down and bottom-up effects into the model resulted in a comparable fit as when including bottom-up effects alone. Taken together, our results suggest that roach decline is mainly driven by phytoplankton decline.",
keywords = "Bottom-up, Large river, Leslie matrix, Roach stock, Top-down",
author = "W. Otjacques and {De Laender}, F. and P. Kestemont",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.12.002",
language = "English",
volume = "322",
pages = "92--100",
journal = "Ecological Modelling",
issn = "0304-3800",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discerning the causes of a decline in a common European fish, the roach (Rutilus rutilus L.)

T2 - A modelling approach

AU - Otjacques, W.

AU - De Laender, F.

AU - Kestemont, P.

PY - 2016/2/24

Y1 - 2016/2/24

N2 - Stock assessment of roach (Rutilus rutilus) in the river Meuse (Belgium), based on two decades of research, indicated a sudden stock decline since the early 2010s. While roach was very abundant during the 1990s and beginning of the 2000s with densities estimated around 3000-3700fishha-1, densities dropped below 400fishha-1 since 2010. A drop in primary production since 2005 and an increase in predation pressure by the Great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) between 2000 and 2006 are listed among potential explanations. In the present study, three scenarios were explored using an age-structured Leslie matrix to investigate if bottom-up control (phytoplankton driven), top-down control (predation driven) or a combination of both can explain the observed decline of roach stock. Including only a phytoplankton-dependent reduction of carrying capacity into the model (i.e. bottom-up control) accurately predicted the observed densities. If only predation by wintering populations of Great Cormorant was considered, the model did not predict the observed decline in roach stock. Combining top-down and bottom-up effects into the model resulted in a comparable fit as when including bottom-up effects alone. Taken together, our results suggest that roach decline is mainly driven by phytoplankton decline.

AB - Stock assessment of roach (Rutilus rutilus) in the river Meuse (Belgium), based on two decades of research, indicated a sudden stock decline since the early 2010s. While roach was very abundant during the 1990s and beginning of the 2000s with densities estimated around 3000-3700fishha-1, densities dropped below 400fishha-1 since 2010. A drop in primary production since 2005 and an increase in predation pressure by the Great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) between 2000 and 2006 are listed among potential explanations. In the present study, three scenarios were explored using an age-structured Leslie matrix to investigate if bottom-up control (phytoplankton driven), top-down control (predation driven) or a combination of both can explain the observed decline of roach stock. Including only a phytoplankton-dependent reduction of carrying capacity into the model (i.e. bottom-up control) accurately predicted the observed densities. If only predation by wintering populations of Great Cormorant was considered, the model did not predict the observed decline in roach stock. Combining top-down and bottom-up effects into the model resulted in a comparable fit as when including bottom-up effects alone. Taken together, our results suggest that roach decline is mainly driven by phytoplankton decline.

KW - Bottom-up

KW - Large river

KW - Leslie matrix

KW - Roach stock

KW - Top-down

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951848426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.12.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84951848426

VL - 322

SP - 92

EP - 100

JO - Ecological Modelling

JF - Ecological Modelling

SN - 0304-3800

ER -