XPS and SEM evaluation of six Chemical and Physiclal Techniques for cleaning of contaminated titanium implants

J. Mouhyi, L. Sennerby, Pierre Louette, Jean-Jacques Pireaux, N. Dourov, S. Nammour, J. van Reck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to analyse clinically failed and retrieved implants prior to and after cleaning by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray induced photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) as compared to unused controls. Six different chemical and physical techniques for cleaning of contaminated titanium implants were evaluated: 1) rinsing in absolute ethanol for 10 min, 2) cleaning in ultrasonic baths containing trichloroethylene (TRI) and absolute ethanol, 10 min in each solution, 3) abrasive cleaning for 30 s, 4) cleaning in supersaturated citric acid for 30 s, 5) cleaning with continuous CO2 laser in dry conditions at 5 W for 10 s, 6) cleaning with continuous CO2 laser in wet conditions (saline) at 5 W for 10 s. SEM of failed implants showed the presence of contaminants of varying sizes and XPS showed almost no titanium but high carbon signals. XPS of unused titanium implants showed lower levels of titanium as previously reported, probably due to contamination of carbon which increased with time in room air. Cleaning of used implants in citric acid followed by rinsing with deionized water for 5 min followed by cleaning in ultrasonic baths with TRI and absolute ethanol gave the best results with regard to macroscopical appearance and surface composition. However, as compared to the unused implants the results from an element composition point of view were still unsatisfactory. It is concluded that further development and testing of techniques for cleaning of organically contaminated titanium is needed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-194
Number of pages10
Journal Clinical oral implants research
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'XPS and SEM evaluation of six Chemical and Physiclal Techniques for cleaning of contaminated titanium implants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this