TY - JOUR
T1 - The law and economics of AI liability
AU - Buiten , Miriam C.
AU - De Streel, Alexandre
AU - Peitz, Martin
N1 - Funding Information:
This paper is based on the report “EU liability rules for the age of Artificial Intelligence” prepared in March 2021 by the authors for the Centre on Regulation in Europe (CERRE ), which received the support and/or input of BEUC, the European Commission (DG JUST, DG CNECT and DG GROW), Google, and Vodafone. Martin Peitz gratefully acknowledges support from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through CRC TR 224 (project B05).
Funding Information:
This paper is based on the report “EU liability rules for the age of Artificial Intelligence” prepared in March 2021 by the authors for the Centre on Regulation in Europe (CERRE <http://www.cerre.eu/>), which received the support and/or input of BEUC, the European Commission (DG JUST, DG CNECT and DG GROW), Google, and Vodafone. Martin Peitz gratefully acknowledges support from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through CRC TR 224 (project B05).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - The employment of AI systems presents challenges for liability rules. This paper identifies these challenges and evaluates how liability rules should be adapted in response. The paper discusses the gaps in liability that arise when AI systems are unpredictable or act (semi)-autonomously. It considers the problems in proving fault and causality when errors in AI systems are difficult to foresee for producers, and monitoring duties of users are difficult to define. From an economic perspective, the paper considers what liability rules would minimise costs of harm related to AI. Based on the analysis of risks and optimal liability rules, the paper evaluates the recently published EU proposals for a Product Liability Directive and for an AI Liability Directive.
AB - The employment of AI systems presents challenges for liability rules. This paper identifies these challenges and evaluates how liability rules should be adapted in response. The paper discusses the gaps in liability that arise when AI systems are unpredictable or act (semi)-autonomously. It considers the problems in proving fault and causality when errors in AI systems are difficult to foresee for producers, and monitoring duties of users are difficult to define. From an economic perspective, the paper considers what liability rules would minimise costs of harm related to AI. Based on the analysis of risks and optimal liability rules, the paper evaluates the recently published EU proposals for a Product Liability Directive and for an AI Liability Directive.
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - EU law
KW - Liability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148320776&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105794
DO - 10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105794
M3 - Article
SN - 0267-3649
VL - 48
JO - Computer Law and Security Report
JF - Computer Law and Security Report
M1 - 105794
ER -