Invalid Ballots and Electoral Competition

Gani Aldashev, Giovanni Mastrobuoni

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

In close elections, a sufficiently high share of invalid ballots - if driven by voter mistakes or electoral fraud - can jeopardize the electoral outcome. We study how the closeness of electoral race relates to the share of invalid ballots, under the traditional paper-ballot hand-counted voting technology. Using a large micro-level data set from the Italian parliamentary elections in 1994-2001, we find a strong robust negative relationship between the margin of victory of the leading candidate over the nearest rival and the share of invalid ballots. We argue that this relationship is not driven by voter mistakes, protest, or electoral fraud. The explanation that garners most support is that of rational allocation of effort by election officers and party representatives, with higher rates of detection of invalid ballots in close elections.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)289-310
Number of pages22
JournalPolitical Science Research and Methods
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

election
fraud
voter
parliamentary election
micro level
protest
voting
candidacy

Cite this

Aldashev, Gani ; Mastrobuoni, Giovanni. / Invalid Ballots and Electoral Competition. In: Political Science Research and Methods. 2019 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 289-310.
@article{0946a44b8f5e4cd1b132c2aa6c65e00e,
title = "Invalid Ballots and Electoral Competition",
abstract = "In close elections, a sufficiently high share of invalid ballots - if driven by voter mistakes or electoral fraud - can jeopardize the electoral outcome. We study how the closeness of electoral race relates to the share of invalid ballots, under the traditional paper-ballot hand-counted voting technology. Using a large micro-level data set from the Italian parliamentary elections in 1994-2001, we find a strong robust negative relationship between the margin of victory of the leading candidate over the nearest rival and the share of invalid ballots. We argue that this relationship is not driven by voter mistakes, protest, or electoral fraud. The explanation that garners most support is that of rational allocation of effort by election officers and party representatives, with higher rates of detection of invalid ballots in close elections.",
author = "Gani Aldashev and Giovanni Mastrobuoni",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/psrm.2016.36",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "289--310",
journal = "Political Science Research and Methods",
issn = "2049-8470",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

Invalid Ballots and Electoral Competition. / Aldashev, Gani; Mastrobuoni, Giovanni.

In: Political Science Research and Methods, Vol. 7, No. 2, 01.04.2019, p. 289-310.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Invalid Ballots and Electoral Competition

AU - Aldashev, Gani

AU - Mastrobuoni, Giovanni

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - In close elections, a sufficiently high share of invalid ballots - if driven by voter mistakes or electoral fraud - can jeopardize the electoral outcome. We study how the closeness of electoral race relates to the share of invalid ballots, under the traditional paper-ballot hand-counted voting technology. Using a large micro-level data set from the Italian parliamentary elections in 1994-2001, we find a strong robust negative relationship between the margin of victory of the leading candidate over the nearest rival and the share of invalid ballots. We argue that this relationship is not driven by voter mistakes, protest, or electoral fraud. The explanation that garners most support is that of rational allocation of effort by election officers and party representatives, with higher rates of detection of invalid ballots in close elections.

AB - In close elections, a sufficiently high share of invalid ballots - if driven by voter mistakes or electoral fraud - can jeopardize the electoral outcome. We study how the closeness of electoral race relates to the share of invalid ballots, under the traditional paper-ballot hand-counted voting technology. Using a large micro-level data set from the Italian parliamentary elections in 1994-2001, we find a strong robust negative relationship between the margin of victory of the leading candidate over the nearest rival and the share of invalid ballots. We argue that this relationship is not driven by voter mistakes, protest, or electoral fraud. The explanation that garners most support is that of rational allocation of effort by election officers and party representatives, with higher rates of detection of invalid ballots in close elections.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059602596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/psrm.2016.36

DO - 10.1017/psrm.2016.36

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85059602596

VL - 7

SP - 289

EP - 310

JO - Political Science Research and Methods

JF - Political Science Research and Methods

SN - 2049-8470

IS - 2

ER -