Viscoelastometric Testing to Assess Hemostasis of COVID-19: A Systematic Review

Marion Bareille, Michaël Hardy, Jonathan Douxfils, Stéphanie Roullet, Dominique Lasne, Jerrold H Levy, Alain Stépanian, Sophie Susen, Corinne Frère, Thomas Lecompte, François Mullier

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journal/une revueArticleRevue par des pairs

30 Téléchargements (Pure)


Infection by SARS‐CoV‐2 is associated with a high risk of thrombosis. The laboratory documentation of hypercoagulability and impaired fibrinolysis remains a challenge. Our aim was to assess the potential usefulness of viscoelastometric testing (VET) to predict thrombotic events in COVID‐19 patients according to the literature. We also (i) analyzed the impact of anticoagulation and the methods used to neutralize heparin, (ii) analyzed whether maximal clot mechanical strength brings more information than Clauss fibrinogen, and (iii) critically scrutinized the diagnosis of hypofibrinolysis. We performed a systematic search in PubMed and Scopus databases until December 31st, 2020. VET methods and parameters, and patients’ features and outcomes were extracted. VET was performed for 1063 patients (893 intensive care unit (ICU) and 170 non‐ICU, 44 studies). There was extensive heterogeneity concerning study design, VET device used (ROTEM, TEG, Quantra and ClotPro) and reagents (with non‐systematic use of heparin neutralization), timing of assay, and definition of hypercoagulable state. Notably, only 4 out of 25 studies using ROTEM reported data with heparinase (HEPTEM). The common findings were increased clot mechanical strength mainly due to excessive fibrinogen component and impaired to absent fibrinolysis, more conspicuous in the presence of an added plasminogen activator. Only 4 studies out of the 16 that addressed the point found an association of VETs with thrombotic events. So‐called functional fibrinogen assessed by VETs showed a variable correlation with Clauss fibrinogen. Abnormal VET pattern, often evidenced despite standard prophylactic anticoagulation, tended to normalize after increased dosing. VET studies reported heterogeneity, and small sample sizes do not support an association between the poorly defined prothrombotic phenotype of COVID‐19 and thrombotic events.

langue originaleAnglais
Numéro d'article1740
journalJournal of clinical medicine
Numéro de publication8
Les DOIs
Etat de la publicationPublié - 16 avr. 2021

Empreinte digitale

Examiner les sujets de recherche de « Viscoelastometric Testing to Assess Hemostasis of COVID-19: A Systematic Review ». Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte digitale unique.

Contient cette citation