The explosive combination of religious decentralization and autocracy: The case of Islam

Emmanuelle Auriol, Jean-Philippe Platteau

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journal/une revueArticle

Résumé

The relationship between religion and politics is explored from a theoretical standpoint. Religious clerics can be seduced by an autocrat and political stability is at stake. The autocrat’s decisions consist of two measures both capable of antagonizing religious clerics: adopting secular reforms and unduly appropriating part of the national wealth, which generally are complements. Compared to centralized religions, decentralized religions, such as Islam, tend to discourage secular reforms and corruption but those effects are not guaranteed if the autocrat accepts political instability. The main hypotheses and the central results of the theory are illustrated with regime case studies that refer to contemporary times.
langue originaleAnglais
Pages (de - à)313-350
Nombre de pages38
journalEconomics of Transition
Volume25
Numéro de publication2
Les DOIs
étatPublié - 1 avr. 2017

Empreinte digitale

Autocracy
Decentralization
Islam
Political stability
Political instability
National wealth
Corruption

mots-clés

  • autocracy, instrumentalization of religion, Islam, decentralized religions

Citer ceci

@article{02485274a4644abaa695541bb66ca683,
title = "The explosive combination of religious decentralization and autocracy: The case of Islam",
abstract = "The relationship between religion and politics is explored from a theoretical standpoint. Religious clerics can be seduced by an autocrat and political stability is at stake. The autocrat’s decisions consist of two measures both capable of antagonizing religious clerics: adopting secular reforms and unduly appropriating part of the national wealth, which generally are complements. Compared to centralized religions, decentralized religions, such as Islam, tend to discourage secular reforms and corruption but those effects are not guaranteed if the autocrat accepts political instability. The main hypotheses and the central results of the theory are illustrated with regime case studies that refer to contemporary times.",
keywords = "autocracy, instrumentalization of religion, Islam, decentralized religions, autocracy, instrumentalization of religion, centralized and decentralized religion, Islam, economic development, reforms, corruption, Autocracy",
author = "Emmanuelle Auriol and Jean-Philippe Platteau",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ecot.12123",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "313--350",
journal = "Economics of Transition",
issn = "0967-0750",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

The explosive combination of religious decentralization and autocracy : The case of Islam. / Auriol, Emmanuelle; Platteau, Jean-Philippe.

Dans: Economics of Transition, Vol 25, Numéro 2, 01.04.2017, p. 313-350.

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journal/une revueArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The explosive combination of religious decentralization and autocracy

T2 - The case of Islam

AU - Auriol, Emmanuelle

AU - Platteau, Jean-Philippe

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - The relationship between religion and politics is explored from a theoretical standpoint. Religious clerics can be seduced by an autocrat and political stability is at stake. The autocrat’s decisions consist of two measures both capable of antagonizing religious clerics: adopting secular reforms and unduly appropriating part of the national wealth, which generally are complements. Compared to centralized religions, decentralized religions, such as Islam, tend to discourage secular reforms and corruption but those effects are not guaranteed if the autocrat accepts political instability. The main hypotheses and the central results of the theory are illustrated with regime case studies that refer to contemporary times.

AB - The relationship between religion and politics is explored from a theoretical standpoint. Religious clerics can be seduced by an autocrat and political stability is at stake. The autocrat’s decisions consist of two measures both capable of antagonizing religious clerics: adopting secular reforms and unduly appropriating part of the national wealth, which generally are complements. Compared to centralized religions, decentralized religions, such as Islam, tend to discourage secular reforms and corruption but those effects are not guaranteed if the autocrat accepts political instability. The main hypotheses and the central results of the theory are illustrated with regime case studies that refer to contemporary times.

KW - autocracy, instrumentalization of religion, Islam, decentralized religions

KW - autocracy

KW - instrumentalization of religion

KW - centralized and decentralized religion

KW - Islam

KW - economic development

KW - reforms

KW - corruption

KW - Autocracy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017563481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ecot.12123

DO - 10.1111/ecot.12123

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 313

EP - 350

JO - Economics of Transition

JF - Economics of Transition

SN - 0967-0750

IS - 2

ER -