TY - JOUR
T1 - The co-management approach has positive impacts on mangrove conservation
T2 - evidence from the mono transboundary biosphere reserve (Togo-Benin), West Africa
AU - Gnansounou, Setondé Constant
AU - Sagoe, Alberta Ama
AU - Mattah, Precious Agbeko Dzorgbe
AU - Salako, Kolawolé Valère
AU - Aheto, Denis Worlanyo
AU - Glèlè Kakaï, Romain
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by the project ACECoR (African Center of Excellence in Coastal Resilience) through the World Bank ACE Grant Number 6389-G. The authors are therefore grateful to the Word Bank, the Government of Ghana and the Centre for Coastal Management (CCM), University of Cape Coast for the financial and technical support.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Literature on conservation science has documented the increasing use of the co-management approach to effectively conserve natural resources. Although some studies found the co-management approach as highly effective, others also reported some uncertainties associated with the use of this conservation approach. Using the mono transboundary biosphere reserve (MTBR) as a case study, this work assessed the effectiveness of the co-management approach for mangrove conservation in West Africa. Data was collected in two protected sites of the reserve (one in Togo and the other in Benin). Exploratory sequential mixed method via in-depth interviews (n = 17), focus group discussions (n = 14), household surveys (n = 274) and expert-based surveys (n = 10) were carried out, and data was analyzed using the InVEST-based Habitat Risk Assessment (HRA) model, chi-square tests and simple probability of likelihood. Findings showed that the co-management approach has lowered anthropogenic stressors to mangroves in the reserve. Under the co-management approach, all the mangroves located in the Benin side of the reserve are identified as under low risk whereas 42% of the mangrove cover are considered under low risk and 58% under medium risk in Togo. Local perception also portrayed the reduction of mangrove degradation in the study sites following the adoption of the co-management approach in the two countries. However, there are some challenges such as the financial support provision and regular community engagement which need to be thoroughly researched and addressed to achieve the sustainability of the positive impacts of the co-management in the MTBR.
AB - Literature on conservation science has documented the increasing use of the co-management approach to effectively conserve natural resources. Although some studies found the co-management approach as highly effective, others also reported some uncertainties associated with the use of this conservation approach. Using the mono transboundary biosphere reserve (MTBR) as a case study, this work assessed the effectiveness of the co-management approach for mangrove conservation in West Africa. Data was collected in two protected sites of the reserve (one in Togo and the other in Benin). Exploratory sequential mixed method via in-depth interviews (n = 17), focus group discussions (n = 14), household surveys (n = 274) and expert-based surveys (n = 10) were carried out, and data was analyzed using the InVEST-based Habitat Risk Assessment (HRA) model, chi-square tests and simple probability of likelihood. Findings showed that the co-management approach has lowered anthropogenic stressors to mangroves in the reserve. Under the co-management approach, all the mangroves located in the Benin side of the reserve are identified as under low risk whereas 42% of the mangrove cover are considered under low risk and 58% under medium risk in Togo. Local perception also portrayed the reduction of mangrove degradation in the study sites following the adoption of the co-management approach in the two countries. However, there are some challenges such as the financial support provision and regular community engagement which need to be thoroughly researched and addressed to achieve the sustainability of the positive impacts of the co-management in the MTBR.
KW - Co-management
KW - Habitat Risk Assessment
KW - Mangroves
KW - Mono transboundary biosphere reserve
KW - West Africa
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137582624&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://rdcu.be/cV6lb
U2 - 10.1007/s11273-022-09894-0
DO - 10.1007/s11273-022-09894-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85137582624
SN - 0923-4861
VL - 30
SP - 1245
EP - 1259
JO - Wetlands Ecology and Management
JF - Wetlands Ecology and Management
IS - 6
ER -