‘Securitization’ revisited: Theory and cases

Thierry Braspenning, Sarah Léonard, Jan Rizicka

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journal/une revueArticle

Résumé

Securitization theory seeks to explain the politics through which (1) the security character of public problems is established, (2) the social commitments resulting from the collective acceptance that a phenomenon is a threat are fixed and (3) the possibility of a particular policy is created. In the last decade, research on securitization has grown significantly. The aim of this article is to evaluate the achievements of securitization theory. First, its main concepts and premises are critically discussed. This article then proceeds to examine the empirical applications of securitization theory to a broad range of issues, as well as the theoretical implications of these studies. Finally, it discusses the main challenges faced by securitization scholars and puts forward strategies to overcome them. This article develops three inter-related arguments. First, notably thanks to empirical studies, securitization theory has significantly developed beyond its initial focus on the speech act. Second, as a result, the distinctiveness of securitization theory currently lies in its capacity to articulate a specific approach to security – influenced by the speech act – with an ‘analytics of government’, which emphasizes practices and processes. Third, securitization theory faces three types of challenges, related, respectively, to theory, method and methodology. The capacity of scholars to overcome those will strongly influence the extent to which securitization theory will be able to make significant contributions to the debates in Security Studies and International Relations in the years to come.
langue originaleAnglais
Pages (de - à)494-531
Nombre de pages38
journale-International Relations
Volume30
Numéro de publication4
Date de mise en ligne précoce5 août 2015
Les DOIs
étatPublié - 1 déc. 2016

Empreinte digitale

speech act
international relations
acceptance
commitment
threat
politics
methodology

Citer ceci

Braspenning, Thierry ; Léonard, Sarah ; Rizicka, Jan. / ‘Securitization’ revisited : Theory and cases. Dans: e-International Relations. 2016 ; Vol 30, Numéro 4. p. 494-531.
@article{b173055cbba0428291caf75d8ed887ea,
title = "‘Securitization’ revisited: Theory and cases",
abstract = "Securitization theory seeks to explain the politics through which (1) the security character of public problems is established, (2) the social commitments resulting from the collective acceptance that a phenomenon is a threat are fixed and (3) the possibility of a particular policy is created. In the last decade, research on securitization has grown significantly. The aim of this article is to evaluate the achievements of securitization theory. First, its main concepts and premises are critically discussed. This article then proceeds to examine the empirical applications of securitization theory to a broad range of issues, as well as the theoretical implications of these studies. Finally, it discusses the main challenges faced by securitization scholars and puts forward strategies to overcome them. This article develops three inter-related arguments. First, notably thanks to empirical studies, securitization theory has significantly developed beyond its initial focus on the speech act. Second, as a result, the distinctiveness of securitization theory currently lies in its capacity to articulate a specific approach to security – influenced by the speech act – with an ‘analytics of government’, which emphasizes practices and processes. Third, securitization theory faces three types of challenges, related, respectively, to theory, method and methodology. The capacity of scholars to overcome those will strongly influence the extent to which securitization theory will be able to make significant contributions to the debates in Security Studies and International Relations in the years to come.",
author = "Thierry Braspenning and Sarah L{\'e}onard and Jan Rizicka",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0047117815596590",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "494--531",
journal = "e-International Relations",
issn = "0047-1178",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

‘Securitization’ revisited : Theory and cases. / Braspenning, Thierry; Léonard, Sarah; Rizicka, Jan.

Dans: e-International Relations, Vol 30, Numéro 4, 01.12.2016, p. 494-531.

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journal/une revueArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘Securitization’ revisited

T2 - Theory and cases

AU - Braspenning, Thierry

AU - Léonard, Sarah

AU - Rizicka, Jan

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Securitization theory seeks to explain the politics through which (1) the security character of public problems is established, (2) the social commitments resulting from the collective acceptance that a phenomenon is a threat are fixed and (3) the possibility of a particular policy is created. In the last decade, research on securitization has grown significantly. The aim of this article is to evaluate the achievements of securitization theory. First, its main concepts and premises are critically discussed. This article then proceeds to examine the empirical applications of securitization theory to a broad range of issues, as well as the theoretical implications of these studies. Finally, it discusses the main challenges faced by securitization scholars and puts forward strategies to overcome them. This article develops three inter-related arguments. First, notably thanks to empirical studies, securitization theory has significantly developed beyond its initial focus on the speech act. Second, as a result, the distinctiveness of securitization theory currently lies in its capacity to articulate a specific approach to security – influenced by the speech act – with an ‘analytics of government’, which emphasizes practices and processes. Third, securitization theory faces three types of challenges, related, respectively, to theory, method and methodology. The capacity of scholars to overcome those will strongly influence the extent to which securitization theory will be able to make significant contributions to the debates in Security Studies and International Relations in the years to come.

AB - Securitization theory seeks to explain the politics through which (1) the security character of public problems is established, (2) the social commitments resulting from the collective acceptance that a phenomenon is a threat are fixed and (3) the possibility of a particular policy is created. In the last decade, research on securitization has grown significantly. The aim of this article is to evaluate the achievements of securitization theory. First, its main concepts and premises are critically discussed. This article then proceeds to examine the empirical applications of securitization theory to a broad range of issues, as well as the theoretical implications of these studies. Finally, it discusses the main challenges faced by securitization scholars and puts forward strategies to overcome them. This article develops three inter-related arguments. First, notably thanks to empirical studies, securitization theory has significantly developed beyond its initial focus on the speech act. Second, as a result, the distinctiveness of securitization theory currently lies in its capacity to articulate a specific approach to security – influenced by the speech act – with an ‘analytics of government’, which emphasizes practices and processes. Third, securitization theory faces three types of challenges, related, respectively, to theory, method and methodology. The capacity of scholars to overcome those will strongly influence the extent to which securitization theory will be able to make significant contributions to the debates in Security Studies and International Relations in the years to come.

U2 - 10.1177/0047117815596590

DO - 10.1177/0047117815596590

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 494

EP - 531

JO - e-International Relations

JF - e-International Relations

SN - 0047-1178

IS - 4

ER -