Reforming Belgium's federalism: Comparing the views of MPs and voters

Min Reuchamps, Dave Sinardet, Jérémy Dodeigne, Didier Caluwaerts

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journal/une revueArticle

Résumé

Consociational theory posits that political elites in divided societies will show a stronger 'spirit of accommodation' than the groups they represent, and that this prudent leadership on behalf of the elites explains why divided societies hold together. Belgium has long been considered to be one of the best examples of such a consociational democracy. Yet in this country the spirit of accommodation of prudent leaders was questioned and discussed publicly during the 2010-11 political gridlock. The question is therefore whether Belgian political elites are indeed less radical and hold less extreme views than voters, as suggested by consociational theory. To explore this question, this article relies on survey data gathered during the historically long government negotiations of 2010-11 between members of all six Belgian assemblies. This original data set on MPs is compared with data on voters gathered in 2009 and 2014 in order to contrast their views on the reform of Belgium's federalism. The results show that voters are less radical than MPs on this question, but the data also reveal that MPs are strongly divided within communities and also within party. Neither communities nor parties are monolithic blocks.

langueAnglais
Pages460-482
Nombre de pages23
journalGovernment and Opposition
Volume52
Numéro3
Les DOIs
étatPublié - 1 juil. 2017
Modification externeOui

Empreinte digitale

federalism
Belgium
political elite
Belgian
accommodation
society
community
consociational democracy
elite
leadership
leader
reform
Group

mots-clés

    Citer ceci

    Reuchamps, Min ; Sinardet, Dave ; Dodeigne, Jérémy ; Caluwaerts, Didier. / Reforming Belgium's federalism : Comparing the views of MPs and voters. Dans: Government and Opposition. 2017 ; Vol 52, Numéro 3. p. 460-482
    @article{fa70b89cba1a40899cde5ca8c770346e,
    title = "Reforming Belgium\{textquoteleft}s federalism: Comparing the views of MPs and voters",
    abstract = "Consociational theory posits that political elites in divided societies will show a stronger \{textquoteleft}spirit of accommodation\{textquoteleft} than the groups they represent, and that this prudent leadership on behalf of the elites explains why divided societies hold together. Belgium has long been considered to be one of the best examples of such a consociational democracy. Yet in this country the spirit of accommodation of prudent leaders was questioned and discussed publicly during the 2010-11 political gridlock. The question is therefore whether Belgian political elites are indeed less radical and hold less extreme views than voters, as suggested by consociational theory. To explore this question, this article relies on survey data gathered during the historically long government negotiations of 2010-11 between members of all six Belgian assemblies. This original data set on MPs is compared with data on voters gathered in 2009 and 2014 in order to contrast their views on the reform of Belgium\{textquoteleft}s federalism. The results show that voters are less radical than MPs on this question, but the data also reveal that MPs are strongly divided within communities and also within party. Neither communities nor parties are monolithic blocks.",
    keywords = "Belgium, federalism, identities, MPs, political parties, voters",
    author = "Min Reuchamps and Dave Sinardet and J\{'e}r\{'e}my Dodeigne and Didier Caluwaerts",
    year = "2017",
    month = "7",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1017/gov.2015.29",
    language = "English",
    volume = "52",
    pages = "460--482",
    journal = "Government and Opposition",
    issn = "0017-257X",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    number = "3",

    }

    Reuchamps, M, Sinardet, D, Dodeigne, J & Caluwaerts, D 2017, 'Reforming Belgium's federalism: Comparing the views of MPs and voters' Government and Opposition, VOL 52, Numéro 3, p. 460-482. DOI: 10.1017/gov.2015.29

    Reforming Belgium's federalism : Comparing the views of MPs and voters. / Reuchamps, Min; Sinardet, Dave; Dodeigne, Jérémy; Caluwaerts, Didier.

    Dans: Government and Opposition, Vol 52, Numéro 3, 01.07.2017, p. 460-482.

    Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journal/une revueArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Reforming Belgium's federalism

    T2 - Government and Opposition

    AU - Reuchamps,Min

    AU - Sinardet,Dave

    AU - Dodeigne,Jérémy

    AU - Caluwaerts,Didier

    PY - 2017/7/1

    Y1 - 2017/7/1

    N2 - Consociational theory posits that political elites in divided societies will show a stronger 'spirit of accommodation' than the groups they represent, and that this prudent leadership on behalf of the elites explains why divided societies hold together. Belgium has long been considered to be one of the best examples of such a consociational democracy. Yet in this country the spirit of accommodation of prudent leaders was questioned and discussed publicly during the 2010-11 political gridlock. The question is therefore whether Belgian political elites are indeed less radical and hold less extreme views than voters, as suggested by consociational theory. To explore this question, this article relies on survey data gathered during the historically long government negotiations of 2010-11 between members of all six Belgian assemblies. This original data set on MPs is compared with data on voters gathered in 2009 and 2014 in order to contrast their views on the reform of Belgium's federalism. The results show that voters are less radical than MPs on this question, but the data also reveal that MPs are strongly divided within communities and also within party. Neither communities nor parties are monolithic blocks.

    AB - Consociational theory posits that political elites in divided societies will show a stronger 'spirit of accommodation' than the groups they represent, and that this prudent leadership on behalf of the elites explains why divided societies hold together. Belgium has long been considered to be one of the best examples of such a consociational democracy. Yet in this country the spirit of accommodation of prudent leaders was questioned and discussed publicly during the 2010-11 political gridlock. The question is therefore whether Belgian political elites are indeed less radical and hold less extreme views than voters, as suggested by consociational theory. To explore this question, this article relies on survey data gathered during the historically long government negotiations of 2010-11 between members of all six Belgian assemblies. This original data set on MPs is compared with data on voters gathered in 2009 and 2014 in order to contrast their views on the reform of Belgium's federalism. The results show that voters are less radical than MPs on this question, but the data also reveal that MPs are strongly divided within communities and also within party. Neither communities nor parties are monolithic blocks.

    KW - Belgium

    KW - federalism

    KW - identities

    KW - MPs

    KW - political parties

    KW - voters

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949559186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1017/gov.2015.29

    DO - 10.1017/gov.2015.29

    M3 - Article

    VL - 52

    SP - 460

    EP - 482

    JO - Government and Opposition

    JF - Government and Opposition

    SN - 0017-257X

    IS - 3

    ER -

    Reuchamps M, Sinardet D, Dodeigne J, Caluwaerts D. Reforming Belgium's federalism: Comparing the views of MPs and voters. Government and Opposition. 2017 juil. 1;52(3):460-482. Disponible �, DOI: 10.1017/gov.2015.29