Prudent behavior rather than chemical deception enables a parasite to exploit its ant host

Thomas Parmentier, Frederik De Laender, Tom Wenseleers, Dries Bonte

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journal/une revueArticle

Résumé

Many parasites display complex strategies to evade host detection. The principal view is that the parasites of social insects deceive their host by means of advanced chemical adaptations such as mimicking the cuticular host recognition cues, being chemically odorless, or emitting manipulative volatiles. Apart from these chemical adaptations, parasites of social insects may also use simpler behavioral strategies to evade host detection. As yet, such a behavior has rarely been studied. Here we tested which chemical and behavioral strategies the unspecialized parasitic rove beetle Thiasophila angulata uses to avoid detection by its aggressive Formica rufa red wood ant host. Chemical comparisons of the beetle's and the host ants' cuticular hydrocarbons showed that the beetle carried an idiosyncratic cuticular profile that was clearly different from that of its host. Beetles that were isolated from their host or were placed in the nests of another Formica species perfectly retained their original cuticular profiles and provoked equal levels of aggression. These results suggest that the beetles do not avoid host detection through chemical deception. In contrast, the beetle adapted its behavior to avoid aggression by the ants. In the presence of ants, the beetle behaved much more prudently by hiding more frequently and engaging in less risky runs. Overall, these results highlight that for relatively unspecialized parasites, general strategies such as prudent behavior can be equally effective as more specialized deception strategies to evade host detection.

langue originaleAnglais
Pages (de - à)1225-1233
Nombre de pages9
journalBehavioral Ecology
Volume29
Numéro de publication6
Les DOIs
étatPublié - 1 janv. 2018

Empreinte digitale

ant
Formicidae
parasite
parasites
beetle
Coleoptera
social insect
social insects
aggression
Formica rufa
chemical
Formica
Staphylinidae
hydrocarbons
nest
nests
detection
hydrocarbon

Citer ceci

@article{3b76cc8cefa44f3abe84d6ba8a8cc338,
title = "Prudent behavior rather than chemical deception enables a parasite to exploit its ant host",
abstract = "Many parasites display complex strategies to evade host detection. The principal view is that the parasites of social insects deceive their host by means of advanced chemical adaptations such as mimicking the cuticular host recognition cues, being chemically odorless, or emitting manipulative volatiles. Apart from these chemical adaptations, parasites of social insects may also use simpler behavioral strategies to evade host detection. As yet, such a behavior has rarely been studied. Here we tested which chemical and behavioral strategies the unspecialized parasitic rove beetle Thiasophila angulata uses to avoid detection by its aggressive Formica rufa red wood ant host. Chemical comparisons of the beetle's and the host ants' cuticular hydrocarbons showed that the beetle carried an idiosyncratic cuticular profile that was clearly different from that of its host. Beetles that were isolated from their host or were placed in the nests of another Formica species perfectly retained their original cuticular profiles and provoked equal levels of aggression. These results suggest that the beetles do not avoid host detection through chemical deception. In contrast, the beetle adapted its behavior to avoid aggression by the ants. In the presence of ants, the beetle behaved much more prudently by hiding more frequently and engaging in less risky runs. Overall, these results highlight that for relatively unspecialized parasites, general strategies such as prudent behavior can be equally effective as more specialized deception strategies to evade host detection.",
keywords = "Chemical mimicry, Hydrocarbon, Myrmecophile, Red wood ant, Risk avoidance, Staphylinidae",
author = "Thomas Parmentier and {De Laender}, Frederik and Tom Wenseleers and Dries Bonte",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/beheco/ary134",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "1225--1233",
journal = "Behavioral Ecology",
issn = "1045-2249",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",

}

Prudent behavior rather than chemical deception enables a parasite to exploit its ant host. / Parmentier, Thomas; De Laender, Frederik; Wenseleers, Tom; Bonte, Dries.

Dans: Behavioral Ecology, Vol 29, Numéro 6, 01.01.2018, p. 1225-1233.

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journal/une revueArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prudent behavior rather than chemical deception enables a parasite to exploit its ant host

AU - Parmentier, Thomas

AU - De Laender, Frederik

AU - Wenseleers, Tom

AU - Bonte, Dries

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Many parasites display complex strategies to evade host detection. The principal view is that the parasites of social insects deceive their host by means of advanced chemical adaptations such as mimicking the cuticular host recognition cues, being chemically odorless, or emitting manipulative volatiles. Apart from these chemical adaptations, parasites of social insects may also use simpler behavioral strategies to evade host detection. As yet, such a behavior has rarely been studied. Here we tested which chemical and behavioral strategies the unspecialized parasitic rove beetle Thiasophila angulata uses to avoid detection by its aggressive Formica rufa red wood ant host. Chemical comparisons of the beetle's and the host ants' cuticular hydrocarbons showed that the beetle carried an idiosyncratic cuticular profile that was clearly different from that of its host. Beetles that were isolated from their host or were placed in the nests of another Formica species perfectly retained their original cuticular profiles and provoked equal levels of aggression. These results suggest that the beetles do not avoid host detection through chemical deception. In contrast, the beetle adapted its behavior to avoid aggression by the ants. In the presence of ants, the beetle behaved much more prudently by hiding more frequently and engaging in less risky runs. Overall, these results highlight that for relatively unspecialized parasites, general strategies such as prudent behavior can be equally effective as more specialized deception strategies to evade host detection.

AB - Many parasites display complex strategies to evade host detection. The principal view is that the parasites of social insects deceive their host by means of advanced chemical adaptations such as mimicking the cuticular host recognition cues, being chemically odorless, or emitting manipulative volatiles. Apart from these chemical adaptations, parasites of social insects may also use simpler behavioral strategies to evade host detection. As yet, such a behavior has rarely been studied. Here we tested which chemical and behavioral strategies the unspecialized parasitic rove beetle Thiasophila angulata uses to avoid detection by its aggressive Formica rufa red wood ant host. Chemical comparisons of the beetle's and the host ants' cuticular hydrocarbons showed that the beetle carried an idiosyncratic cuticular profile that was clearly different from that of its host. Beetles that were isolated from their host or were placed in the nests of another Formica species perfectly retained their original cuticular profiles and provoked equal levels of aggression. These results suggest that the beetles do not avoid host detection through chemical deception. In contrast, the beetle adapted its behavior to avoid aggression by the ants. In the presence of ants, the beetle behaved much more prudently by hiding more frequently and engaging in less risky runs. Overall, these results highlight that for relatively unspecialized parasites, general strategies such as prudent behavior can be equally effective as more specialized deception strategies to evade host detection.

KW - Chemical mimicry

KW - Hydrocarbon

KW - Myrmecophile

KW - Red wood ant

KW - Risk avoidance

KW - Staphylinidae

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064341112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/beheco/ary134

DO - 10.1093/beheco/ary134

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 1225

EP - 1233

JO - Behavioral Ecology

JF - Behavioral Ecology

SN - 1045-2249

IS - 6

ER -