TY - JOUR
T1 - Political regime and COVID 19 death rate
T2 - Efficient, biasing or simply different autocracies?An econometric analysis.
AU - Cassan, Guilhem
AU - Van Steenvoort, Milan
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to Jeremie Decalf, Romain Lutaud, Glenn Magerman, Marc Sangnier and Vincenzo Verardi for helpful discussions and suggestions. We thank seminar participants at UNamur. Guilhem Cassan thanks CEPREMAP and the FNRS for financial support. Research on this project was financially supported by the Excellence of Science ( EOS ) Research project of FNRS O020918F. All errors remain our own.
Funding Information:
We are grateful to Jeremie Decalf, Romain Lutaud, Glenn Magerman, Marc Sangnier and Vincenzo Verardi for helpful discussions and suggestions. We thank seminar participants at UNamur. Guilhem Cassan thanks CEPREMAP and the FNRS for financial support. Research on this project was financially supported by the Excellence of Science (EOS) Research project of FNRS O020918F. All errors remain our own.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - The difference in COVID 19 death rates across political regimes has caught a lot of attention. The “efficient autocracy” view suggests that autocracies may be more efficient at putting in place policies that contain COVID 19 spread. On the other hand, the “biasing autocracy” view underlines that autocracies may be under reporting their COVID 19 data. We use fixed effect panel regression methods to discriminate between the two sides of the debate. Our results present a more nuanced picture: once pre-determined characteristics of countries are accounted for, COVID 19 death rates equalize across political regimes during the first months of the pandemic, but remain largely different a year into the pandemic. This emphasizes that early differences across political regimes were mainly due to omitted variable bias, whereas later differences are likely due to data manipulation by autocracies. A year into the pandemic, we estimate that this data manipulation may have hidden approximately 400,000 deaths worldwide.
AB - The difference in COVID 19 death rates across political regimes has caught a lot of attention. The “efficient autocracy” view suggests that autocracies may be more efficient at putting in place policies that contain COVID 19 spread. On the other hand, the “biasing autocracy” view underlines that autocracies may be under reporting their COVID 19 data. We use fixed effect panel regression methods to discriminate between the two sides of the debate. Our results present a more nuanced picture: once pre-determined characteristics of countries are accounted for, COVID 19 death rates equalize across political regimes during the first months of the pandemic, but remain largely different a year into the pandemic. This emphasizes that early differences across political regimes were mainly due to omitted variable bias, whereas later differences are likely due to data manipulation by autocracies. A year into the pandemic, we estimate that this data manipulation may have hidden approximately 400,000 deaths worldwide.
KW - Autocracy
KW - COVID 19
KW - Democracy
KW - Political regimes
KW - Public health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122527757&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100912
DO - 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100912
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85122527757
SN - 2352-8273
VL - 16
JO - SSM - Population Health
JF - SSM - Population Health
M1 - 100912
ER -