On the diversity of stationary cosmologies in the first half of the twentieth century

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journal/une revueArticle

Résumé

Before the establishment of the hot Big Bang scenario as the modern paradigm of cosmology, it faced several early competitors : the so-called stationary cosmological models. There were truly plural and independent approaches incorporating cosmic expansion but without time evolution of the total cosmological density, thanks to the inclusion of some processes of continuous matter creation. We distinguish here three different independent motivations leading to a stationary vision of the universe. First, Einstein’s concerns on the asymptotic behaviour of gravitation led him to consider continuous matter creation in a recently discovered unpublished work dated of 1931. Second, there is the quest by Dirac and Jordan for a scientific explanation of numerical coincidences in the values of fundamental constants, leading both to a time variation of Newton’s constant and spontaneous matter creation. The third one appears in the steady-state theory of Bondi and Gold as the postulate of the Perfect Cosmological Principle according to which the properties of the universe do not depend in any way of the location and the epoch of the observer. Hoyle developed a mathematical model of spontaneous matter creation from a modification of general relativity that should be considered as a direct legacy of Einstein’s and Dirac’s approaches. Hoyle’s model allows obtaining a “wide cosmological principle” as an end-product, echoing Bondi and Gold’s Perfect Cosmological Principle. Somewhat ironically, many modern key questions in hot Big Bang cosmology, like dark energy and inflation, can therefore be directly related to the physical motivations of the early stationary cosmologies.
langue originaleAnglais
Numéro d'article11
Nombre de pages18
journalGeneral Relativity and Gravitation
Volume51
Numéro de publication1
Les DOIs
étatPublié - 1 janv. 2019

Empreinte digitale

universe
big bang cosmology
gold
Jordan
axioms
dark energy
newton
cosmology
relativity
mathematical models
time measurement
inclusions
gravitation
expansion
products

Citer ceci

@article{494e120cb39949f9994136f41bfe45bf,
title = "On the diversity of stationary cosmologies in the first half of the twentieth century",
abstract = "Before the establishment of the hot Big Bang scenario as the modern paradigm of cosmology, it faced several early competitors : the so-called stationary cosmological models. There were truly plural and independent approaches incorporating cosmic expansion but without time evolution of the total cosmological density, thanks to the inclusion of some processes of continuous matter creation. We distinguish here three different independent motivations leading to a stationary vision of the universe. First, Einstein’s concerns on the asymptotic behaviour of gravitation led him to consider continuous matter creation in a recently discovered unpublished work dated of 1931. Second, there is the quest by Dirac and Jordan for a scientific explanation of numerical coincidences in the values of fundamental constants, leading both to a time variation of Newton’s constant and spontaneous matter creation. The third one appears in the steady-state theory of Bondi and Gold as the postulate of the Perfect Cosmological Principle according to which the properties of the universe do not depend in any way of the location and the epoch of the observer. Hoyle developed a mathematical model of spontaneous matter creation from a modification of general relativity that should be considered as a direct legacy of Einstein’s and Dirac’s approaches. Hoyle’s model allows obtaining a “wide cosmological principle” as an end-product, echoing Bondi and Gold’s Perfect Cosmological Principle. Somewhat ironically, many modern key questions in hot Big Bang cosmology, like dark energy and inflation, can therefore be directly related to the physical motivations of the early stationary cosmologies.",
keywords = "steady-state cosmology, large number coincidence, cosmological principle, history of cosmology",
author = "Andr{\'e} Fuzfa and Eve-Aline Dubois",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-018-2496-8",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
journal = "General Relativity and Gravitation",
issn = "0001-7701",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

On the diversity of stationary cosmologies in the first half of the twentieth century. / Fuzfa, André; Dubois, Eve-Aline.

Dans: General Relativity and Gravitation, Vol 51, Numéro 1, 11, 01.01.2019.

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journal/une revueArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the diversity of stationary cosmologies in the first half of the twentieth century

AU - Fuzfa, André

AU - Dubois, Eve-Aline

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Before the establishment of the hot Big Bang scenario as the modern paradigm of cosmology, it faced several early competitors : the so-called stationary cosmological models. There were truly plural and independent approaches incorporating cosmic expansion but without time evolution of the total cosmological density, thanks to the inclusion of some processes of continuous matter creation. We distinguish here three different independent motivations leading to a stationary vision of the universe. First, Einstein’s concerns on the asymptotic behaviour of gravitation led him to consider continuous matter creation in a recently discovered unpublished work dated of 1931. Second, there is the quest by Dirac and Jordan for a scientific explanation of numerical coincidences in the values of fundamental constants, leading both to a time variation of Newton’s constant and spontaneous matter creation. The third one appears in the steady-state theory of Bondi and Gold as the postulate of the Perfect Cosmological Principle according to which the properties of the universe do not depend in any way of the location and the epoch of the observer. Hoyle developed a mathematical model of spontaneous matter creation from a modification of general relativity that should be considered as a direct legacy of Einstein’s and Dirac’s approaches. Hoyle’s model allows obtaining a “wide cosmological principle” as an end-product, echoing Bondi and Gold’s Perfect Cosmological Principle. Somewhat ironically, many modern key questions in hot Big Bang cosmology, like dark energy and inflation, can therefore be directly related to the physical motivations of the early stationary cosmologies.

AB - Before the establishment of the hot Big Bang scenario as the modern paradigm of cosmology, it faced several early competitors : the so-called stationary cosmological models. There were truly plural and independent approaches incorporating cosmic expansion but without time evolution of the total cosmological density, thanks to the inclusion of some processes of continuous matter creation. We distinguish here three different independent motivations leading to a stationary vision of the universe. First, Einstein’s concerns on the asymptotic behaviour of gravitation led him to consider continuous matter creation in a recently discovered unpublished work dated of 1931. Second, there is the quest by Dirac and Jordan for a scientific explanation of numerical coincidences in the values of fundamental constants, leading both to a time variation of Newton’s constant and spontaneous matter creation. The third one appears in the steady-state theory of Bondi and Gold as the postulate of the Perfect Cosmological Principle according to which the properties of the universe do not depend in any way of the location and the epoch of the observer. Hoyle developed a mathematical model of spontaneous matter creation from a modification of general relativity that should be considered as a direct legacy of Einstein’s and Dirac’s approaches. Hoyle’s model allows obtaining a “wide cosmological principle” as an end-product, echoing Bondi and Gold’s Perfect Cosmological Principle. Somewhat ironically, many modern key questions in hot Big Bang cosmology, like dark energy and inflation, can therefore be directly related to the physical motivations of the early stationary cosmologies.

KW - steady-state cosmology

KW - large number coincidence

KW - cosmological principle

KW - history of cosmology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059348271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-018-2496-8

DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-018-2496-8

M3 - Article

VL - 51

JO - General Relativity and Gravitation

JF - General Relativity and Gravitation

SN - 0001-7701

IS - 1

M1 - 11

ER -