Résumé
Policy-makers are increasingly experimenting with various ways to involve citizens in policy-making. Deliberative forums composed of lay citizens (minipublics) count among the most popular of such innovations. Despite their popularity, it is often unclear in what ways such minipublics could affect policy-making. This article addresses this issue of conceptual ambiguity by drawing on an original systematic review of the literature. It shows that the literature has approached these consequences in three ways: congruence with decisions, consideration in the policy-making process, and structural change. The article discusses the implications for empirical research and points out trajectories for future research on deliberative minipublics.
langue originale | Anglais |
---|---|
Pages (de - à) | 468-487 |
Nombre de pages | 20 |
journal | Administration and Society |
Volume | 53 |
Numéro de publication | 3 |
Date de mise en ligne précoce | 7 oct. 2020 |
Les DOIs | |
Etat de la publication | Publié - mars 2021 |