TY - JOUR
T1 - Corrigendum to “Imidazolium bromide substituted magnesium phthalocyanine polymers
T2 - New promising materials for CO2 conversion” [J. CO2 Util. 85 (2024) 102875–102886](S2212982024002105)(10.1016/j.jcou.2024.102875)
AU - Taormina, Benedetto
AU - Jouclas, Rémy
AU - Marsala, Vittorio
AU - Gruttadauria, Michelangelo
AU - Giacalone, Francesco
AU - Aprile, Carmela
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - The authors regret to inform you about a miscalculation in one of the reported TON/TOF values. The TON reported in entry 4 (Table 2) is not the one related to the reaction at 125 °C giving 71 % conversion into styrene carbonate but the one related to a quantitative conversion achieved at a slightly higher temperature of 150 °C. In both cases the reaction conditions were: 24 mL of epoxide (210 mmol), 60 mg cat. (16 μmol of Mg estimated by ICP-OES analysis), 25 bar of CO2, 500 r.p.m. The correct data are reported here below: [Table presented] In the last version of the article, we decided to report only the test performed at 125 °C since an excellent conversion was obtained at a lower temperature, moreover the TOF reported for the full conversion at 150 °C after 24 h is most probably underestimated. However, by mistake, the two TON/TOF values were exchanged and the value reported in the published table were: [Table presented] The 1H NMR of the reaction giving quantitative conversion is reported below:[Figure presented] The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. We felt obliged to make the necessary correction once we realized the mistake reported in the table.
AB - The authors regret to inform you about a miscalculation in one of the reported TON/TOF values. The TON reported in entry 4 (Table 2) is not the one related to the reaction at 125 °C giving 71 % conversion into styrene carbonate but the one related to a quantitative conversion achieved at a slightly higher temperature of 150 °C. In both cases the reaction conditions were: 24 mL of epoxide (210 mmol), 60 mg cat. (16 μmol of Mg estimated by ICP-OES analysis), 25 bar of CO2, 500 r.p.m. The correct data are reported here below: [Table presented] In the last version of the article, we decided to report only the test performed at 125 °C since an excellent conversion was obtained at a lower temperature, moreover the TOF reported for the full conversion at 150 °C after 24 h is most probably underestimated. However, by mistake, the two TON/TOF values were exchanged and the value reported in the published table were: [Table presented] The 1H NMR of the reaction giving quantitative conversion is reported below:[Figure presented] The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. We felt obliged to make the necessary correction once we realized the mistake reported in the table.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85210963368&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcou.2024.102982
DO - 10.1016/j.jcou.2024.102982
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85210963368
SN - 2212-9820
VL - 90
JO - Journal of CO2 Utilization
JF - Journal of CO2 Utilization
M1 - 102982
ER -