CLIL, an elitist language learning approach? A background analysis of English and Dutch CLIL pupils in French-speaking Belgium.

Luk Van Mensel, Benoît Galand, Philippe Hiligsmann, Laurence Mettewie

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journal/une revueArticle

4 Downloads (Pure)

Résumé

Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) programmes are increasingly popular throughout Europe, but are sometimes accused of inducing a selection bias in the pupil population, both through selection mechanisms of the schools themselves and self- selection of the pupils (and/or their parents). As a result, the outcomes of the CLIL approach may be artificially promoted, and, at the same time, such a selection bias can contribute to an elitist education model, which arguably runs counter to the aims of the approach. This paper looks into a number of background variables of both English and Dutch CLIL learners in Francophone Belgium and compares them to their non-CLIL counterparts. Results from a logistic regression indicate that there is indeed evidence of selection: the socio-economic status of the pupils appears as the main predictor of whether a pupil is in a CLIL or a non-CLIL track, whereas other, more personal, variables such as non-verbal intelligence play a minor (or additional) role. Moreover, Dutch CLIL programmes appear to be more selective than English CLIL programmes in this context. We conclude that CLIL (and particularly Dutch CLIL) in French-speaking Belgium, although a priori open to anyone, is particularly attractive to a socially privileged public.
langue originaleAnglais
journalLanguage, Culture and Curriculum
Date de mise en ligne précoce2019
Les DOIs
étatPublié - 1 janv. 2019

Empreinte digitale

Belgium
speaking
pupil
language
learning
Elitist
Language Acquisition
Pupil
Content and Language Integrated Learning
accused
trend
intelligence
parents
logistics
regression

Citer ceci

@article{77a280b7f9db481a87135dc7994d6f57,
title = "CLIL, an elitist language learning approach?: A background analysis of English and Dutch CLIL pupils in French-speaking Belgium.",
abstract = "Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) programmes are increasingly popular throughout Europe, but are sometimes accused of inducing a selection bias in the pupil population, both through selection mechanisms of the schools themselves and self- selection of the pupils (and/or their parents). As a result, the outcomes of the CLIL approach may be artificially promoted, and, at the same time, such a selection bias can contribute to an elitist education model, which arguably runs counter to the aims of the approach. This paper looks into a number of background variables of both English and Dutch CLIL learners in Francophone Belgium and compares them to their non-CLIL counterparts. Results from a logistic regression indicate that there is indeed evidence of selection: the socio-economic status of the pupils appears as the main predictor of whether a pupil is in a CLIL or a non-CLIL track, whereas other, more personal, variables such as non-verbal intelligence play a minor (or additional) role. Moreover, Dutch CLIL programmes appear to be more selective than English CLIL programmes in this context. We conclude that CLIL (and particularly Dutch CLIL) in French-speaking Belgium, although a priori open to anyone, is particularly attractive to a socially privileged public.",
keywords = "CLIL, Belgium, foreign language learning, selection",
author = "{Van Mensel}, Luk and Beno{\^i}t Galand and Philippe Hiligsmann and Laurence Mettewie",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "DOI: 10.1080/07908318.2019.1571078",
language = "English",
journal = "Language, Culture and Curriculum",
issn = "1747-7573",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

CLIL, an elitist language learning approach? A background analysis of English and Dutch CLIL pupils in French-speaking Belgium. / Van Mensel, Luk; Galand, Benoît; Hiligsmann, Philippe; Mettewie, Laurence.

Dans: Language, Culture and Curriculum, 01.01.2019.

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journal/une revueArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - CLIL, an elitist language learning approach?

T2 - A background analysis of English and Dutch CLIL pupils in French-speaking Belgium.

AU - Van Mensel, Luk

AU - Galand, Benoît

AU - Hiligsmann, Philippe

AU - Mettewie, Laurence

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) programmes are increasingly popular throughout Europe, but are sometimes accused of inducing a selection bias in the pupil population, both through selection mechanisms of the schools themselves and self- selection of the pupils (and/or their parents). As a result, the outcomes of the CLIL approach may be artificially promoted, and, at the same time, such a selection bias can contribute to an elitist education model, which arguably runs counter to the aims of the approach. This paper looks into a number of background variables of both English and Dutch CLIL learners in Francophone Belgium and compares them to their non-CLIL counterparts. Results from a logistic regression indicate that there is indeed evidence of selection: the socio-economic status of the pupils appears as the main predictor of whether a pupil is in a CLIL or a non-CLIL track, whereas other, more personal, variables such as non-verbal intelligence play a minor (or additional) role. Moreover, Dutch CLIL programmes appear to be more selective than English CLIL programmes in this context. We conclude that CLIL (and particularly Dutch CLIL) in French-speaking Belgium, although a priori open to anyone, is particularly attractive to a socially privileged public.

AB - Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) programmes are increasingly popular throughout Europe, but are sometimes accused of inducing a selection bias in the pupil population, both through selection mechanisms of the schools themselves and self- selection of the pupils (and/or their parents). As a result, the outcomes of the CLIL approach may be artificially promoted, and, at the same time, such a selection bias can contribute to an elitist education model, which arguably runs counter to the aims of the approach. This paper looks into a number of background variables of both English and Dutch CLIL learners in Francophone Belgium and compares them to their non-CLIL counterparts. Results from a logistic regression indicate that there is indeed evidence of selection: the socio-economic status of the pupils appears as the main predictor of whether a pupil is in a CLIL or a non-CLIL track, whereas other, more personal, variables such as non-verbal intelligence play a minor (or additional) role. Moreover, Dutch CLIL programmes appear to be more selective than English CLIL programmes in this context. We conclude that CLIL (and particularly Dutch CLIL) in French-speaking Belgium, although a priori open to anyone, is particularly attractive to a socially privileged public.

KW - CLIL

KW - Belgium

KW - foreign language learning

KW - selection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061031946&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - DOI: 10.1080/07908318.2019.1571078

DO - DOI: 10.1080/07908318.2019.1571078

M3 - Article

JO - Language, Culture and Curriculum

JF - Language, Culture and Curriculum

SN - 1747-7573

ER -