Brucella-positive raw milk cheese sold on the inner European market: A public health threat due to illegal import?

Wiebke Jansen, Catherine Linard, Matthias Noll, Karsten Nöckler, Sascha Al Dahouk

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journal/une revueArticle

Résumé

Travel and migration are the major drivers of human brucellosis in Western Europe. The infection is usually transmitted through the consumption of unpasteurized milk or dairy products in or from endemic regions. Although eradicated from livestock in Germany and most Member States of the European Union, considerable numbers of domestic human brucellosis cases have been reported annually. The actual source of these autochthonous cases in non-endemic countries remains to be elucidated. We therefore evaluated the presence of Brucella spp. in 200 cheese samples originating from endemic countries which were sold at weekly markets, in supermarkets and by delis in Berlin (Germany) as well as online. The cheese samples included loose, non-labelled and pre-packed, labelled cheese of five types (brine, cream, soft, semi-hard and hard cheese), made from bovine, ovine and caprine milk. The cheese was mainly declared as raw milk cheese by the retailers. We screened for and confirmed the presence of Brucella-DNA in cheese using genus-specific quantitative real-time PCRs targeting IS711 and bcsp31, respectively. The molecular prevalence of Brucella was 20.5% (n = 41), but viable Brucellae could not be isolated from the positively tested samples using classical culture methods. The logistic regression model indicated that Brucella was significantly more often detected in late summer purchases (p = 0.036) as well as in cheese from Bulgaria, France, Greece and Turkey (p = 0.017). In contrast to the vendor information, essentially only three positive cheese samples were made from raw milk. Moreover, positive samples clustered at certain vendors which indicates large-scale illegal imports. In summary, Brucella in imported raw milk cheese seems to be still a challenge for food safety standards in the European Union. Uncontrolled import of dairy products from endemic regions might explain human Brucella infections acquired in non-endemic EU countries.

langue originaleAnglais
Pages (de - à)130-137
Nombre de pages8
journalFood Control
Volume100
Les DOIs
étatPublié - 1 juin 2019

Empreinte digitale

Brucella
Cheese
raw milk
imports
cheeses
public health
Milk
Public Health
markets
dairy products
brucellosis
Dairy Products
Brucellosis
European Union
sampling
Germany
Logistic Models
hard cheeses
safety standards
Bulgaria

Citer ceci

@article{92854523678a43ddb8dacb0526b35b8c,
title = "Brucella-positive raw milk cheese sold on the inner European market: A public health threat due to illegal import?",
abstract = "Travel and migration are the major drivers of human brucellosis in Western Europe. The infection is usually transmitted through the consumption of unpasteurized milk or dairy products in or from endemic regions. Although eradicated from livestock in Germany and most Member States of the European Union, considerable numbers of domestic human brucellosis cases have been reported annually. The actual source of these autochthonous cases in non-endemic countries remains to be elucidated. We therefore evaluated the presence of Brucella spp. in 200 cheese samples originating from endemic countries which were sold at weekly markets, in supermarkets and by delis in Berlin (Germany) as well as online. The cheese samples included loose, non-labelled and pre-packed, labelled cheese of five types (brine, cream, soft, semi-hard and hard cheese), made from bovine, ovine and caprine milk. The cheese was mainly declared as raw milk cheese by the retailers. We screened for and confirmed the presence of Brucella-DNA in cheese using genus-specific quantitative real-time PCRs targeting IS711 and bcsp31, respectively. The molecular prevalence of Brucella was 20.5{\%} (n = 41), but viable Brucellae could not be isolated from the positively tested samples using classical culture methods. The logistic regression model indicated that Brucella was significantly more often detected in late summer purchases (p = 0.036) as well as in cheese from Bulgaria, France, Greece and Turkey (p = 0.017). In contrast to the vendor information, essentially only three positive cheese samples were made from raw milk. Moreover, positive samples clustered at certain vendors which indicates large-scale illegal imports. In summary, Brucella in imported raw milk cheese seems to be still a challenge for food safety standards in the European Union. Uncontrolled import of dairy products from endemic regions might explain human Brucella infections acquired in non-endemic EU countries.",
keywords = "Brucellosis, Dairy products, Germany, Illegal food import, Zoonosis",
author = "Wiebke Jansen and Catherine Linard and Matthias Noll and Karsten N{\"o}ckler and {Al Dahouk}, Sascha",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.01.022",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "130--137",
journal = "Food Control",
issn = "0956-7135",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

Brucella-positive raw milk cheese sold on the inner European market : A public health threat due to illegal import? / Jansen, Wiebke; Linard, Catherine; Noll, Matthias; Nöckler, Karsten; Al Dahouk, Sascha.

Dans: Food Control, Vol 100, 01.06.2019, p. 130-137.

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journal/une revueArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Brucella-positive raw milk cheese sold on the inner European market

T2 - A public health threat due to illegal import?

AU - Jansen, Wiebke

AU - Linard, Catherine

AU - Noll, Matthias

AU - Nöckler, Karsten

AU - Al Dahouk, Sascha

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Travel and migration are the major drivers of human brucellosis in Western Europe. The infection is usually transmitted through the consumption of unpasteurized milk or dairy products in or from endemic regions. Although eradicated from livestock in Germany and most Member States of the European Union, considerable numbers of domestic human brucellosis cases have been reported annually. The actual source of these autochthonous cases in non-endemic countries remains to be elucidated. We therefore evaluated the presence of Brucella spp. in 200 cheese samples originating from endemic countries which were sold at weekly markets, in supermarkets and by delis in Berlin (Germany) as well as online. The cheese samples included loose, non-labelled and pre-packed, labelled cheese of five types (brine, cream, soft, semi-hard and hard cheese), made from bovine, ovine and caprine milk. The cheese was mainly declared as raw milk cheese by the retailers. We screened for and confirmed the presence of Brucella-DNA in cheese using genus-specific quantitative real-time PCRs targeting IS711 and bcsp31, respectively. The molecular prevalence of Brucella was 20.5% (n = 41), but viable Brucellae could not be isolated from the positively tested samples using classical culture methods. The logistic regression model indicated that Brucella was significantly more often detected in late summer purchases (p = 0.036) as well as in cheese from Bulgaria, France, Greece and Turkey (p = 0.017). In contrast to the vendor information, essentially only three positive cheese samples were made from raw milk. Moreover, positive samples clustered at certain vendors which indicates large-scale illegal imports. In summary, Brucella in imported raw milk cheese seems to be still a challenge for food safety standards in the European Union. Uncontrolled import of dairy products from endemic regions might explain human Brucella infections acquired in non-endemic EU countries.

AB - Travel and migration are the major drivers of human brucellosis in Western Europe. The infection is usually transmitted through the consumption of unpasteurized milk or dairy products in or from endemic regions. Although eradicated from livestock in Germany and most Member States of the European Union, considerable numbers of domestic human brucellosis cases have been reported annually. The actual source of these autochthonous cases in non-endemic countries remains to be elucidated. We therefore evaluated the presence of Brucella spp. in 200 cheese samples originating from endemic countries which were sold at weekly markets, in supermarkets and by delis in Berlin (Germany) as well as online. The cheese samples included loose, non-labelled and pre-packed, labelled cheese of five types (brine, cream, soft, semi-hard and hard cheese), made from bovine, ovine and caprine milk. The cheese was mainly declared as raw milk cheese by the retailers. We screened for and confirmed the presence of Brucella-DNA in cheese using genus-specific quantitative real-time PCRs targeting IS711 and bcsp31, respectively. The molecular prevalence of Brucella was 20.5% (n = 41), but viable Brucellae could not be isolated from the positively tested samples using classical culture methods. The logistic regression model indicated that Brucella was significantly more often detected in late summer purchases (p = 0.036) as well as in cheese from Bulgaria, France, Greece and Turkey (p = 0.017). In contrast to the vendor information, essentially only three positive cheese samples were made from raw milk. Moreover, positive samples clustered at certain vendors which indicates large-scale illegal imports. In summary, Brucella in imported raw milk cheese seems to be still a challenge for food safety standards in the European Union. Uncontrolled import of dairy products from endemic regions might explain human Brucella infections acquired in non-endemic EU countries.

KW - Brucellosis

KW - Dairy products

KW - Germany

KW - Illegal food import

KW - Zoonosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060956165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.01.022

DO - 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.01.022

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 130

EP - 137

JO - Food Control

JF - Food Control

SN - 0956-7135

ER -