Assessing carbon footprint and energy efficiency in competing supply chains: Review - Case studies and benchmarking

C. Rizet; M. Browne; J. Leonardi; E. Cornelis

doi:10.1016/j.trd.2012.01.002

Assessing carbon footprint and energy efficiency in competing supply chains: Review - Case studies and benchmarking

C. Rizet, M. Browne, J. Leonardi, E. Cornelis

Namur Institute for Complex Systems

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journal/une revue › Article › Revue par des pairs

Résumé

This article compares the energy consumption and CO emissions of supply chains in Belgium, France and UK looking in particular at, jeans, yogurts, apples, tomatoes and furniture. We use a generic methodology that allows comparability across the supply chain of products, supply chains, and countries. Our benchmarking show relatively high emissions for maritime transport and the consumer leg, while logistics activities such as storage and road freight exhibit relatively low emissions. The influences of distance, retail type, area density and consumer behaviour are also examined. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.

langue originale	Anglais
Pages (de - à)	293-300
Nombre de pages	8
journal	Transportation Research Part D : Transport and Environment
Volume	17
Numéro de publication	4
Les DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2012.01.002
Etat de la publication	Publié - 1 juin 2012

SDG des Nations Unies

Ce résultat contribue à ou aux Objectifs de développement durable suivants

Accès au document

10.1016/j.trd.2012.01.002

Autres fichiers et liens

Link to publication in Scopus

Efficacité énergétique et émissions de GES de différentes formes de chaînes logistiques
Cornelis, E., DESCAMPS, J. & MALCHAIR, A.
4/09/06 → 4/09/08
Projet: Recherche

Contient cette citation

@article{e0b4021d0d3645f1ba55629510e8ff6b,

title = "Assessing carbon footprint and energy efficiency in competing supply chains: Review - Case studies and benchmarking",

abstract = "This article compares the energy consumption and CO emissions of supply chains in Belgium, France and UK looking in particular at, jeans, yogurts, apples, tomatoes and furniture. We use a generic methodology that allows comparability across the supply chain of products, supply chains, and countries. Our benchmarking show relatively high emissions for maritime transport and the consumer leg, while logistics activities such as storage and road freight exhibit relatively low emissions. The influences of distance, retail type, area density and consumer behaviour are also examined. {\textcopyright} 2012 Elsevier Ltd.",

keywords = " Energy efficient logistics, Supply chain management, Supply chain carbon footprint, Benchmarking energy efficiency",

author = "C. Rizet and M. Browne and J. Leonardi and E. Cornelis",

year = "2012",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.trd.2012.01.002",

language = "English",

volume = "17",

pages = "293--300",

journal = "Transportation Research Part D : Transport and Environment",

issn = "1361-9209",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing carbon footprint and energy efficiency in competing supply chains

T2 - Review - Case studies and benchmarking

AU - Rizet, C.

AU - Browne, M.

AU - Leonardi, J.

AU - Cornelis, E.

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - This article compares the energy consumption and CO emissions of supply chains in Belgium, France and UK looking in particular at, jeans, yogurts, apples, tomatoes and furniture. We use a generic methodology that allows comparability across the supply chain of products, supply chains, and countries. Our benchmarking show relatively high emissions for maritime transport and the consumer leg, while logistics activities such as storage and road freight exhibit relatively low emissions. The influences of distance, retail type, area density and consumer behaviour are also examined. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.

AB - This article compares the energy consumption and CO emissions of supply chains in Belgium, France and UK looking in particular at, jeans, yogurts, apples, tomatoes and furniture. We use a generic methodology that allows comparability across the supply chain of products, supply chains, and countries. Our benchmarking show relatively high emissions for maritime transport and the consumer leg, while logistics activities such as storage and road freight exhibit relatively low emissions. The influences of distance, retail type, area density and consumer behaviour are also examined. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.

KW - Energy efficient logistics

KW - Supply chain management

KW - Supply chain carbon footprint

KW - Benchmarking energy efficiency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857280888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.trd.2012.01.002

DO - 10.1016/j.trd.2012.01.002

M3 - Article

SN - 1361-9209

VL - 17

SP - 293

EP - 300

JO - Transportation Research Part D : Transport and Environment

JF - Transportation Research Part D : Transport and Environment

IS - 4

ER -

Assessing carbon footprint and energy efficiency in competing supply chains: Review - Case studies and benchmarking

Résumé

SDG des Nations Unies

Accès au document

Autres fichiers et liens

Empreinte digitale

Projets

Efficacité énergétique et émissions de GES de différentes formes de chaînes logistiques

Contient cette citation