Zooplankton of Lake Kivu, East Africa, half a century after the Tanganyika sardine introduction

M. Isumbisho, B. Kaningini, H. Sarmento, J.-C. Micha, J.-P. Descy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The introduction into Lake Kivu of the planktivorous fish Limnothrissa miodon at the end of the 1950s raised major concern about the fate of mesozooplankton, but few data were available to assess the impact of predation. In this study, we followed zooplankton variations in Lake Kivu for 3.5 years. Present Lake Kivu mesozooplankton is dominated by cyclopoid copepods (Thermocyclops consimilis, Mesocyclops aequatorialis and Tropocyclops confinis), but cladocerans and rotifers are also present. Each year, total crustacean abundance in the plankton increased to a distinct seasonal maximum following a rise of phytoplankton production associated with a deep epilimnetic mixing in the dry season (August-September). This dependence on phytoplankton resource suggests that mesozooplankton dynamics in Lake Kivu is mainly bottom-up controlled, contrary to expectations from the food web structure. However, measurements of body size indicate that sardine predation affects the cladoceran Diaphanosoma excisum, whereas the larger copepods may efficiently escape predation by migration in the deep mixolimnion at daytime. Total biomass of mesozooplankton in Lake Kivu is lower than in lakes Tanganyika and Malawi. This may be related to the disappearance of a large grazer that existed before the sardine introduction, whereas the large lakes of the same region have a more complex pelagic food web, with piscivorous fish, and with calanoid copepods, which can more efficiently exploit phytoplankton production.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)971-989
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Plankton Research
Volume28
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2006

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Zooplankton of Lake Kivu, East Africa, half a century after the Tanganyika sardine introduction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this