Viscoelastometric Testing to Assess Hemostasis of COVID-19: A Systematic Review

Marion Bareille, Michaël Hardy, Jonathan Douxfils, Stéphanie Roullet, Dominique Lasne, Jerrold H Levy, Alain Stépanian, Sophie Susen, Corinne Frère, Thomas Lecompte, François Mullier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Downloads (Pure)


Infection by SARS‐CoV‐2 is associated with a high risk of thrombosis. The laboratory documentation of hypercoagulability and impaired fibrinolysis remains a challenge. Our aim was to assess the potential usefulness of viscoelastometric testing (VET) to predict thrombotic events in COVID‐19 patients according to the literature. We also (i) analyzed the impact of anticoagulation and the methods used to neutralize heparin, (ii) analyzed whether maximal clot mechanical strength brings more information than Clauss fibrinogen, and (iii) critically scrutinized the diagnosis of hypofibrinolysis. We performed a systematic search in PubMed and Scopus databases until December 31st, 2020. VET methods and parameters, and patients’ features and outcomes were extracted. VET was performed for 1063 patients (893 intensive care unit (ICU) and 170 non‐ICU, 44 studies). There was extensive heterogeneity concerning study design, VET device used (ROTEM, TEG, Quantra and ClotPro) and reagents (with non‐systematic use of heparin neutralization), timing of assay, and definition of hypercoagulable state. Notably, only 4 out of 25 studies using ROTEM reported data with heparinase (HEPTEM). The common findings were increased clot mechanical strength mainly due to excessive fibrinogen component and impaired to absent fibrinolysis, more conspicuous in the presence of an added plasminogen activator. Only 4 studies out of the 16 that addressed the point found an association of VETs with thrombotic events. So‐called functional fibrinogen assessed by VETs showed a variable correlation with Clauss fibrinogen. Abnormal VET pattern, often evidenced despite standard prophylactic anticoagulation, tended to normalize after increased dosing. VET studies reported heterogeneity, and small sample sizes do not support an association between the poorly defined prothrombotic phenotype of COVID‐19 and thrombotic events.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1740
JournalJournal of clinical medicine
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 16 Apr 2021


  • COVID‐19
  • ClotPro
  • Coronavirus disease 2019
  • Quantra
  • SARS‐CoV‐2
  • Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
  • Sonorheometry
  • TEG
  • Thromboelastography
  • Thromboelastometry
  • Viscoelastic test


Dive into the research topics of 'Viscoelastometric Testing to Assess Hemostasis of COVID-19: A Systematic Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this