Using sign language corpora as bilingual corpora for data mining: Contrastive linguistics and computer-assisted annotation

Research output: Contribution in Book/Catalog/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

77 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

More and more sign languages nowadays are now documented by large scale digital corpora. But exploiting sign language (SL) corpus data remains subject to the time consuming and expensive manual task of annotating. In this paper, we present an ongoing research that aims at testing a new approach to better mine SL data. It relies on the methodology of corpus-based contrastive linguistics, exploiting SL corpora as bilingual corpora. We present and illustrate the main improvements we foresee in developing such an approach: downstream,
for the benefit of the linguistic description and the bilingual (signed - spoken) competence of teachers, learners and the users; and upstream, in order to enable the automatisation of the annotation process of sign language data. We also describe the methodology we are using to develop a concordancer able to turn SL corpora into searchable translation corpora, and to derive from it a tool support to annotation.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 7th workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages:Corpus Mining
Subtitle of host publicationLREC 2016
Pages159-166
Number of pages8
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Event7th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Corpus Mining - Grand Hotel Bernardin Conference Center , Portoroz, Slovenia
Duration: 28 May 201628 May 2016

Publication series

NameProceedings of the Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages

Seminar

Seminar7th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Corpus Mining
Country/TerritorySlovenia
CityPortoroz
Period28/05/1628/05/16

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using sign language corpora as bilingual corpora for data mining: Contrastive linguistics and computer-assisted annotation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this