Trust and Differentiation: Prüm and the institutional design of EU internal security

Thierry Braspenning, Amelia Hadfield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

One recent but major policy occurrence in Justice and Home Affairs - the Treaty of Prüm (2005) - has developed within the framework of differentiated integration, thus reopening the debate over the impact of flexibility on EU integration, what causes it, and whether it should be sought by Member States at all. Whatever the consensus, the debate itself demonstrates that the very idea of differentiated integration deserves a renewed attention today ultimately because it affects, in one way or another, the performance of the EU. This article presents a critical analysis of the practice of differentiation in Justice and Home Affairs, by examining its forms, principles and effects. It discusses the literature on the subject, emphasizing the complexity of flexible integration, but reaches different conclusions. Thus, in contrast to the dominant argument, we argue that differentiation is not necessarily about deepening and/or widening EU integration. It is also, and sometimes primarily, about power and interests, two major elements that feed mistrust among Member States. In fact, we demonstrate that mistrust can cause poor differentiation. Moreover, in the absence of trust among Member States, flexibility might contribute to sub-optimal policies. Based on past research and interviews, we substantiate our claim by investigating the driving factors, rationales and consequences of the Treaty of Prüm on the institutionalization of a EU area of Freedom, Security and Justice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)539-561
Number of pages23
JournalCooperation and Conflict
Volume47
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2012

Fingerprint

EU
justice
treaty
flexibility
cause
institutionalization
Institutional design
interview
performance
Justice
Treaties

Keywords

  • differentiation
  • EU security
  • flexible integration
  • information exchange
  • Prüm
  • sovereignty
  • theories of EU integration
  • trust

Cite this

@article{0c6507602f134f52a410bd72c2ab81a2,
title = "Trust and Differentiation: Pr{\"u}m and the institutional design of EU internal security",
abstract = "One recent but major policy occurrence in Justice and Home Affairs - the Treaty of Pr{\"u}m (2005) - has developed within the framework of differentiated integration, thus reopening the debate over the impact of flexibility on EU integration, what causes it, and whether it should be sought by Member States at all. Whatever the consensus, the debate itself demonstrates that the very idea of differentiated integration deserves a renewed attention today ultimately because it affects, in one way or another, the performance of the EU. This article presents a critical analysis of the practice of differentiation in Justice and Home Affairs, by examining its forms, principles and effects. It discusses the literature on the subject, emphasizing the complexity of flexible integration, but reaches different conclusions. Thus, in contrast to the dominant argument, we argue that differentiation is not necessarily about deepening and/or widening EU integration. It is also, and sometimes primarily, about power and interests, two major elements that feed mistrust among Member States. In fact, we demonstrate that mistrust can cause poor differentiation. Moreover, in the absence of trust among Member States, flexibility might contribute to sub-optimal policies. Based on past research and interviews, we substantiate our claim by investigating the driving factors, rationales and consequences of the Treaty of Pr{\"u}m on the institutionalization of a EU area of Freedom, Security and Justice.",
keywords = "differentiation, EU security, flexible integration, information exchange, Pr{\"u}m, sovereignty, theories of EU integration, trust",
author = "Thierry Braspenning and Amelia Hadfield",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1177/0010836712462781",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "539--561",
journal = "Cooperation and Conflict",
issn = "0010-8367",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Trust and Differentiation : Prüm and the institutional design of EU internal security. / Braspenning, Thierry; Hadfield, Amelia.

In: Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 47, No. 4, 12.2012, p. 539-561.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trust and Differentiation

T2 - Prüm and the institutional design of EU internal security

AU - Braspenning, Thierry

AU - Hadfield, Amelia

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - One recent but major policy occurrence in Justice and Home Affairs - the Treaty of Prüm (2005) - has developed within the framework of differentiated integration, thus reopening the debate over the impact of flexibility on EU integration, what causes it, and whether it should be sought by Member States at all. Whatever the consensus, the debate itself demonstrates that the very idea of differentiated integration deserves a renewed attention today ultimately because it affects, in one way or another, the performance of the EU. This article presents a critical analysis of the practice of differentiation in Justice and Home Affairs, by examining its forms, principles and effects. It discusses the literature on the subject, emphasizing the complexity of flexible integration, but reaches different conclusions. Thus, in contrast to the dominant argument, we argue that differentiation is not necessarily about deepening and/or widening EU integration. It is also, and sometimes primarily, about power and interests, two major elements that feed mistrust among Member States. In fact, we demonstrate that mistrust can cause poor differentiation. Moreover, in the absence of trust among Member States, flexibility might contribute to sub-optimal policies. Based on past research and interviews, we substantiate our claim by investigating the driving factors, rationales and consequences of the Treaty of Prüm on the institutionalization of a EU area of Freedom, Security and Justice.

AB - One recent but major policy occurrence in Justice and Home Affairs - the Treaty of Prüm (2005) - has developed within the framework of differentiated integration, thus reopening the debate over the impact of flexibility on EU integration, what causes it, and whether it should be sought by Member States at all. Whatever the consensus, the debate itself demonstrates that the very idea of differentiated integration deserves a renewed attention today ultimately because it affects, in one way or another, the performance of the EU. This article presents a critical analysis of the practice of differentiation in Justice and Home Affairs, by examining its forms, principles and effects. It discusses the literature on the subject, emphasizing the complexity of flexible integration, but reaches different conclusions. Thus, in contrast to the dominant argument, we argue that differentiation is not necessarily about deepening and/or widening EU integration. It is also, and sometimes primarily, about power and interests, two major elements that feed mistrust among Member States. In fact, we demonstrate that mistrust can cause poor differentiation. Moreover, in the absence of trust among Member States, flexibility might contribute to sub-optimal policies. Based on past research and interviews, we substantiate our claim by investigating the driving factors, rationales and consequences of the Treaty of Prüm on the institutionalization of a EU area of Freedom, Security and Justice.

KW - differentiation

KW - EU security

KW - flexible integration

KW - information exchange

KW - Prüm

KW - sovereignty

KW - theories of EU integration

KW - trust

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870423574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0010836712462781

DO - 10.1177/0010836712462781

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84870423574

VL - 47

SP - 539

EP - 561

JO - Cooperation and Conflict

JF - Cooperation and Conflict

SN - 0010-8367

IS - 4

ER -