Toward benchmarks to assess advancement in legal requirements modeling

Ivan Jureta, Travis Breaux, Alberto Siena, David Gordon

Research output: Contribution in Book/Catalog/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

As software engineers create and evolve information systems to support business practices, these engineers need to address constraints imposed by laws, regulations and policies that govern those business practices. Requirements modeling can be used to extract important legal constraints from laws, and decide how, and evaluate if an information system design complies to applicable laws. To advance research on evaluating requirements modeling formalisms for the representation of legal information, we propose several benchmarks that we believe represent important challenges in modeling laws and requirements governing information systems, and evaluating the compliance of these requirements with laws. While incomplete, the proposed set of benchmarks covers a range of challenges in modeling laws and requirements that we observed in privacy and security law: from the possibility to trace model fragments to law fragments, to the ability to distinguish modalities in law, and to model relations between requirements and law fragments, needed when evaluating compliance. Benchmarks can be used as a checklist when designing and discussing requirements formalisms that support legal requirements modeling. Each benchmark is motivated by related work, a brief legal excerpt, and our experience in modeling regulations.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2013 6th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law, RELAW 2013 - Proceedings
Pages25-33
Number of pages9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2013
Event2013 6th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law, RELAW 2013 - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Duration: 16 Jul 201316 Jul 2013

Conference

Conference2013 6th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law, RELAW 2013
CountryBrazil
CityRio de Janeiro
Period16/07/1316/07/13

Fingerprint

Information systems
Computer simulation
Engineers
Industry
Systems analysis
Compliance

Keywords

  • Benchmarks
  • Evaluation
  • Legal requirements
  • Requirements modeling

Cite this

Jureta, I., Breaux, T., Siena, A., & Gordon, D. (2013). Toward benchmarks to assess advancement in legal requirements modeling. In 2013 6th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law, RELAW 2013 - Proceedings (pp. 25-33). [6671343] https://doi.org/10.1109/RELAW.2013.6671343
Jureta, Ivan ; Breaux, Travis ; Siena, Alberto ; Gordon, David. / Toward benchmarks to assess advancement in legal requirements modeling. 2013 6th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law, RELAW 2013 - Proceedings. 2013. pp. 25-33
@inproceedings{02076ee31e254627a1de1eeea47e4a08,
title = "Toward benchmarks to assess advancement in legal requirements modeling",
abstract = "As software engineers create and evolve information systems to support business practices, these engineers need to address constraints imposed by laws, regulations and policies that govern those business practices. Requirements modeling can be used to extract important legal constraints from laws, and decide how, and evaluate if an information system design complies to applicable laws. To advance research on evaluating requirements modeling formalisms for the representation of legal information, we propose several benchmarks that we believe represent important challenges in modeling laws and requirements governing information systems, and evaluating the compliance of these requirements with laws. While incomplete, the proposed set of benchmarks covers a range of challenges in modeling laws and requirements that we observed in privacy and security law: from the possibility to trace model fragments to law fragments, to the ability to distinguish modalities in law, and to model relations between requirements and law fragments, needed when evaluating compliance. Benchmarks can be used as a checklist when designing and discussing requirements formalisms that support legal requirements modeling. Each benchmark is motivated by related work, a brief legal excerpt, and our experience in modeling regulations.",
keywords = "Benchmarks, Evaluation, Legal requirements, Requirements modeling",
author = "Ivan Jureta and Travis Breaux and Alberto Siena and David Gordon",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/RELAW.2013.6671343",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781479909506",
pages = "25--33",
booktitle = "2013 6th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law, RELAW 2013 - Proceedings",

}

Jureta, I, Breaux, T, Siena, A & Gordon, D 2013, Toward benchmarks to assess advancement in legal requirements modeling. in 2013 6th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law, RELAW 2013 - Proceedings., 6671343, pp. 25-33, 2013 6th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law, RELAW 2013, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 16/07/13. https://doi.org/10.1109/RELAW.2013.6671343

Toward benchmarks to assess advancement in legal requirements modeling. / Jureta, Ivan; Breaux, Travis; Siena, Alberto; Gordon, David.

2013 6th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law, RELAW 2013 - Proceedings. 2013. p. 25-33 6671343.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Catalog/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Toward benchmarks to assess advancement in legal requirements modeling

AU - Jureta, Ivan

AU - Breaux, Travis

AU - Siena, Alberto

AU - Gordon, David

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - As software engineers create and evolve information systems to support business practices, these engineers need to address constraints imposed by laws, regulations and policies that govern those business practices. Requirements modeling can be used to extract important legal constraints from laws, and decide how, and evaluate if an information system design complies to applicable laws. To advance research on evaluating requirements modeling formalisms for the representation of legal information, we propose several benchmarks that we believe represent important challenges in modeling laws and requirements governing information systems, and evaluating the compliance of these requirements with laws. While incomplete, the proposed set of benchmarks covers a range of challenges in modeling laws and requirements that we observed in privacy and security law: from the possibility to trace model fragments to law fragments, to the ability to distinguish modalities in law, and to model relations between requirements and law fragments, needed when evaluating compliance. Benchmarks can be used as a checklist when designing and discussing requirements formalisms that support legal requirements modeling. Each benchmark is motivated by related work, a brief legal excerpt, and our experience in modeling regulations.

AB - As software engineers create and evolve information systems to support business practices, these engineers need to address constraints imposed by laws, regulations and policies that govern those business practices. Requirements modeling can be used to extract important legal constraints from laws, and decide how, and evaluate if an information system design complies to applicable laws. To advance research on evaluating requirements modeling formalisms for the representation of legal information, we propose several benchmarks that we believe represent important challenges in modeling laws and requirements governing information systems, and evaluating the compliance of these requirements with laws. While incomplete, the proposed set of benchmarks covers a range of challenges in modeling laws and requirements that we observed in privacy and security law: from the possibility to trace model fragments to law fragments, to the ability to distinguish modalities in law, and to model relations between requirements and law fragments, needed when evaluating compliance. Benchmarks can be used as a checklist when designing and discussing requirements formalisms that support legal requirements modeling. Each benchmark is motivated by related work, a brief legal excerpt, and our experience in modeling regulations.

KW - Benchmarks

KW - Evaluation

KW - Legal requirements

KW - Requirements modeling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893296380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/RELAW.2013.6671343

DO - 10.1109/RELAW.2013.6671343

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84893296380

SN - 9781479909506

SP - 25

EP - 33

BT - 2013 6th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law, RELAW 2013 - Proceedings

ER -

Jureta I, Breaux T, Siena A, Gordon D. Toward benchmarks to assess advancement in legal requirements modeling. In 2013 6th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law, RELAW 2013 - Proceedings. 2013. p. 25-33. 6671343 https://doi.org/10.1109/RELAW.2013.6671343