The promise of community-driven preprints in ecology and evolution

Daniel Noble, Zoe Xirocostas, Nicholas C. Wu, April Robin Martinig, Rafaela Almeida, Kevin Bairos-Novak, Heikel Balti, Michael Bertram, Louis Bliard, Jack Brand, Ilha Byrne, Ying-Chi Chan, Dena Clink, Quentin Corbel, Ricardo Correia, Jordann Crawford-Ash, Antica Culina, Elvira D'Bastiani, Gideon Deme, Melina de Souza LeiteFélicie Dhellemmes, Shreya Dimri, Szymek Drobniak, Alexander Elsy, Susan Everingham, Samuel Gascoigne, Matthew Grainger, Gavin Hossack, Knut Hovstad, Ed R. Ivimey-Cook, Matt Lloyd Jones, Ineta Kačergytė, Georg Küstner, Dalton Leibold, Magdalena Mair, Jake M. Martin, Ayumi Mizuno, Ian Moodie, David Moreau, Rose O'Dea, James Orr, Matthieu Paquet, Rabindra Parajuli, Joel Pick, Patrice Pottier, Marija Purgar, Pablo Recio, Dominique Roche, Raphaël Royauté, Saeed Sabet, Julio Segovia, Inês Silva, Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar, Bruno Soares, Birgit Szabo, Elina Takola, Eli Thoré, Bishnu Timilsina, Natalie E. van Dis, Wilco C.E.P. Verberk, Stefan J.G. Vriend, Kristoffer H. Wild, Coralie Williams, Yefeng Yang, Shinichi Nakagawa, Malgorzata Lagisz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Publishing preprints is quickly becoming commonplace in ecology and evolutionary biology. Preprints can facilitate the rapid sharing of scientific knowledge establishing precedence and enabling feedback from the research community before peer review. Yet, significant barriers to preprint use exist, including language barriers, a lack of understanding about the benefits of preprints and a lack of diversity in the types of research outputs accepted (e.g. reports). Community-driven preprint initiatives can allow a research community to come together to break down these barriers to improve equity and coverage of global knowledge. Here, we explore the first preprints uploaded to EcoEvoRxiv (n = 1216), a community-driven preprint server for ecologists and evolutionary biologists, to characterize preprint use in ecology, evolution and conservation. Our perspective piece highlights some of the unique initiatives that EcoEvoRxiv has taken to break down barriers to scientific publishing by exploring the composition of articles, how gender and career stage influence preprint use, whether preprints are associated with greater open science practices (e.g. code and data sharing) and tracking preprint publication outcomes. Our analysis identifies areas that we still need to improve upon but highlights how community-driven initiatives, such as EcoEvoRxiv, can play a crucial role in shaping publishing practices in biology.

Original languageEnglish
Article number20241487
JournalProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume292
Issue number2039
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Jan 2025

Funding

DWAN would also like to thank the Australian Research Council for a Future Fellowship (FT220100276). SN and ML are supported by the Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Project Grants (DP210100812 and DP230101248). ARM is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2019-05520 and RN513790-510021). Acknowledgements

FundersFunder number
Australian Research CouncilDP210100812, DP230101248, FT220100276
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaRGPIN-2019-05520, RN513790-510021

    Keywords

    • EcoEvoRxiv
    • ecology
    • evolution
    • grey literature
    • preprints
    • publication
    • scholarly publishing

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The promise of community-driven preprints in ecology and evolution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this