The Power Paradox: Implicit and Explicit Power Motives, and the Importance Attached to Prosocial Organizational Goals in SMEs

Julie Hermans, Hendrik Slabbinck, Johanna Vanderstraeten, Jacqueline Brassey, Marcus Dejardin, Dendi Ramdani, Arjen van Witteloostuijn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We examine the fundamental tension between explicit and implicit power motives; and their combined impact on the importance attached to prosocial organizational goals in small businesses (SMEs). We show that key decision-makers with a dominant implicit power motive attach more importance to the prosocial goals of job creation and taking care of the environment in their businesses. However, we reveal that this positive relationship is moderated by their explicit power motive. Once decision-makers in SMEs consciously seek for power, the positive relationship is neutralized. With these results, we highlight the conceptual and methodological differences between implicit and explicit power motives. We could obtain these results because we developed and validated an innovative implicit motive measure—the Shortened Pictorial Attitude Implicit Association Test (SPA-IAT). Contrary to the currently available implicit motive measures, the SPA-IAT is fast and easy to use and analyze, which makes this novel instrument well suited for research in business settings.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2001
Number of pages26
JournalSustainability
Volume9
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017

Keywords

  • explicit motives
  • implicit motives
  • power motive
  • Small- and medium-size enterprise
  • Power motive
  • Environmental sustainability
  • Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT)
  • Explicit motives
  • Prosocial organizational behavior
  • Implicit motives
  • Job creation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Power Paradox: Implicit and Explicit Power Motives, and the Importance Attached to Prosocial Organizational Goals in SMEs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this