The Impact of Microfinance on the Informal Credit Market: an Adverse Selection Model

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

This paper looks at the other side of the much-celebrated microfinance revolution, namely its potential impact on the conditions of access to credit for non-members (the residual market). It uses a standard adverse selection framework to show the advantage of group lending as a single innovative lending technology, and then to assess how the apparition of this new type of lenders might change the equilibria on rural credit markets, taking into account the reaction of other lenders. We find that two antagonist effects can coexist: a standard competition effect and a composition effect. While the former tends to lower the residual market rate, the latter raises the cost of borrowing outside microfinance institutions (MFIs) due to a worsening of the pool of borrowers. The relative weights of the two effects depend on the market structure, the risk heterogeneity of the population and the actual distance between lending technologies. This arguably less intuitive impact of microfinance, which has been overlooked until now, is important given the nearly-universal coexistence of MFIs and traditional lenders in developing countries. Moreover, it is not only theoretically likely, but seems to match the empirical facts presented in the paper. Our paper is thus a contribution in the understanding of the redistributive implications of the microfinance revolution that has been occurring in the last years.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationNamur
PublisherCRED
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Credit markets
Microfinance
Selection model
Informal credit
Adverse selection
Lending
Microfinance institutions
Rural credit
Access to credit
Relative weight
Group lending
Composition effect
Developing countries
Coexistence
Market structure
Costs
Borrowing

Keywords

  • Microfinance
  • Moneylenders
  • Competition
  • Adverse selection
  • Composition effect

Cite this

@techreport{c0522eec9e4b46e3a5522a9b26614445,
title = "The Impact of Microfinance on the Informal Credit Market: an Adverse Selection Model",
abstract = "This paper looks at the other side of the much-celebrated microfinance revolution, namely its potential impact on the conditions of access to credit for non-members (the residual market). It uses a standard adverse selection framework to show the advantage of group lending as a single innovative lending technology, and then to assess how the apparition of this new type of lenders might change the equilibria on rural credit markets, taking into account the reaction of other lenders. We find that two antagonist effects can coexist: a standard competition effect and a composition effect. While the former tends to lower the residual market rate, the latter raises the cost of borrowing outside microfinance institutions (MFIs) due to a worsening of the pool of borrowers. The relative weights of the two effects depend on the market structure, the risk heterogeneity of the population and the actual distance between lending technologies. This arguably less intuitive impact of microfinance, which has been overlooked until now, is important given the nearly-universal coexistence of MFIs and traditional lenders in developing countries. Moreover, it is not only theoretically likely, but seems to match the empirical facts presented in the paper. Our paper is thus a contribution in the understanding of the redistributive implications of the microfinance revolution that has been occurring in the last years.",
keywords = "Microfinance, Moneylenders, Competition, Adverse selection, Composition effect",
author = "Timoth{\'e}e Demont",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
publisher = "CRED",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "CRED",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - The Impact of Microfinance on the Informal Credit Market: an Adverse Selection Model

AU - Demont, Timothée

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - This paper looks at the other side of the much-celebrated microfinance revolution, namely its potential impact on the conditions of access to credit for non-members (the residual market). It uses a standard adverse selection framework to show the advantage of group lending as a single innovative lending technology, and then to assess how the apparition of this new type of lenders might change the equilibria on rural credit markets, taking into account the reaction of other lenders. We find that two antagonist effects can coexist: a standard competition effect and a composition effect. While the former tends to lower the residual market rate, the latter raises the cost of borrowing outside microfinance institutions (MFIs) due to a worsening of the pool of borrowers. The relative weights of the two effects depend on the market structure, the risk heterogeneity of the population and the actual distance between lending technologies. This arguably less intuitive impact of microfinance, which has been overlooked until now, is important given the nearly-universal coexistence of MFIs and traditional lenders in developing countries. Moreover, it is not only theoretically likely, but seems to match the empirical facts presented in the paper. Our paper is thus a contribution in the understanding of the redistributive implications of the microfinance revolution that has been occurring in the last years.

AB - This paper looks at the other side of the much-celebrated microfinance revolution, namely its potential impact on the conditions of access to credit for non-members (the residual market). It uses a standard adverse selection framework to show the advantage of group lending as a single innovative lending technology, and then to assess how the apparition of this new type of lenders might change the equilibria on rural credit markets, taking into account the reaction of other lenders. We find that two antagonist effects can coexist: a standard competition effect and a composition effect. While the former tends to lower the residual market rate, the latter raises the cost of borrowing outside microfinance institutions (MFIs) due to a worsening of the pool of borrowers. The relative weights of the two effects depend on the market structure, the risk heterogeneity of the population and the actual distance between lending technologies. This arguably less intuitive impact of microfinance, which has been overlooked until now, is important given the nearly-universal coexistence of MFIs and traditional lenders in developing countries. Moreover, it is not only theoretically likely, but seems to match the empirical facts presented in the paper. Our paper is thus a contribution in the understanding of the redistributive implications of the microfinance revolution that has been occurring in the last years.

KW - Microfinance

KW - Moneylenders

KW - Competition

KW - Adverse selection

KW - Composition effect

M3 - Working paper

BT - The Impact of Microfinance on the Informal Credit Market: an Adverse Selection Model

PB - CRED

CY - Namur

ER -