Strong Evaluation Complexity Bounds for Arbitrary-Order Optimization of Nonconvex Nonsmooth Composite Functions

Coralia Cartis, Nick Gould, Philippe Toint

Research output: Working paper

22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We introduce the concept of strong high-order approximate minimizers for nonconvex optimization problems. These apply in both standard smooth and composite non-smooth settings, and additionally allow convex or inexpensive constraints. An adaptive regularization algorithm is then proposed to find such approximate minimizers. Under suitable Lipschitz continuity assumptions, whenever the feasible set is convex, it is shown that using a model of degree p, this algorithm will find a strong approximate q-th-order minimizer in at most O(max_{1 \leq j \leq q}\epsilon_j^{-(p+1)/(p-j+1)}) evaluations of the problem’s functions and their derivatives, where \epsilon_j is the j-th order accuracy tolerance; this bound applies when either q = 1 or the problem is not composite with q \leq 2. For general non-composite problems, even when the feasible set is nonconvex, the bound becomes O(max_{1 \leq j \leq q}\epsilon_j^{-q(p+1)/p}) evaluations. If the problem is composite, and either q > 1 or the feasible set is not convex, the bound is then O(max_{1 \leq j \leq q}\epsilon_j^{-(q+1)}) evaluations. These results not only provide, to our knowledge, the first known bound for (unconstrained or inexpensively-constrained) composite problems for optimality orders exceeding one, but also give the first sharp bounds for high-order strong approximate q-th order minimizers of standard (unconstrained and inexpensively constrained) smooth problems, thereby complementing known results for weak minimizers.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherArxiv
Volume2001-10802
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jan 2020

Keywords

  • nonlinear optimisation
  • complexity theory
  • High-order optimality conditions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Strong Evaluation Complexity Bounds for Arbitrary-Order Optimization of Nonconvex Nonsmooth Composite Functions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this