Squeeze vs. tilt: A comparative study using continuous tactile feedback

Eve Hoggan; Dari Trendafilov; Teemu Ahmaniemi; Roope Raisamo

doi:10.1145/1979742.1979766

Squeeze vs. tilt: A comparative study using continuous tactile feedback

Eve Hoggan, Dari Trendafilov, Teemu Ahmaniemi, Roope Raisamo

Research output: Contribution in Book/Catalog/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

This paper presents an investigation into the performance of squeezing as a manipulative interaction technique in comparison to tilting with an aim to answer two questions: is squeezing an effective input technique for mobile devices and can tactile feedback improve performance? The experiment results show that both input methods are viable but squeezing is significantly faster and more sustainable than tilting (with and without tactile feedback).

Original language	English
Title of host publication	CHI EA 2011 - 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Proceedings and Extended Abstracts
Pages	1309-1314
Number of pages	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979766
Publication status	Published - 2011
Externally published	Yes
Event	29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011 - Vancouver, BC, Canada Duration: 7 May 2011 → 12 May 2011

Publication series

Name	Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Conference

Conference	29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011
Country/Territory	Canada
City	Vancouver, BC
Period	7/05/11 → 12/05/11

Keywords

Haptic I/O
Mobile interaction
Pressure
Squeeze

Access to Document

10.1145/1979742.1979766

Cite this

Hoggan, E., Trendafilov, D., Ahmaniemi, T., & Raisamo, R. (2011). Squeeze vs. tilt: A comparative study using continuous tactile feedback. In CHI EA 2011 - 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Proceedings and Extended Abstracts (pp. 1309-1314). (Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings). https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979766

@inproceedings{b9903b0e883b4e89943047b8526e87c4,

title = "Squeeze vs. tilt: A comparative study using continuous tactile feedback",

abstract = "This paper presents an investigation into the performance of squeezing as a manipulative interaction technique in comparison to tilting with an aim to answer two questions: is squeezing an effective input technique for mobile devices and can tactile feedback improve performance? The experiment results show that both input methods are viable but squeezing is significantly faster and more sustainable than tilting (with and without tactile feedback).",

keywords = "Haptic I/O, Mobile interaction, Pressure, Squeeze",

author = "Eve Hoggan and Dari Trendafilov and Teemu Ahmaniemi and Roope Raisamo",

year = "2011",

doi = "10.1145/1979742.1979766",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781450302289",

series = "Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings",

pages = "1309--1314",

booktitle = "CHI EA 2011 - 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Proceedings and Extended Abstracts",

note = "29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011 ; Conference date: 07-05-2011 Through 12-05-2011",

}

Hoggan, E, Trendafilov, D, Ahmaniemi, T & Raisamo, R 2011, Squeeze vs. tilt: A comparative study using continuous tactile feedback. in CHI EA 2011 - 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Proceedings and Extended Abstracts. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, pp. 1309-1314, 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7/05/11. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979766

Squeeze vs. tilt: A comparative study using continuous tactile feedback. / Hoggan, Eve; Trendafilov, Dari; Ahmaniemi, Teemu et al.
CHI EA 2011 - 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Proceedings and Extended Abstracts. 2011. p. 1309-1314 (Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings).

Research output: Contribution in Book/Catalog/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Squeeze vs. tilt

T2 - 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011

AU - Hoggan, Eve

AU - Trendafilov, Dari

AU - Ahmaniemi, Teemu

AU - Raisamo, Roope

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This paper presents an investigation into the performance of squeezing as a manipulative interaction technique in comparison to tilting with an aim to answer two questions: is squeezing an effective input technique for mobile devices and can tactile feedback improve performance? The experiment results show that both input methods are viable but squeezing is significantly faster and more sustainable than tilting (with and without tactile feedback).

AB - This paper presents an investigation into the performance of squeezing as a manipulative interaction technique in comparison to tilting with an aim to answer two questions: is squeezing an effective input technique for mobile devices and can tactile feedback improve performance? The experiment results show that both input methods are viable but squeezing is significantly faster and more sustainable than tilting (with and without tactile feedback).

KW - Haptic I/O

KW - Mobile interaction

KW - Pressure

KW - Squeeze

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957943879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/1979742.1979766

DO - 10.1145/1979742.1979766

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:79957943879

SN - 9781450302289

T3 - Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

SP - 1309

EP - 1314

BT - CHI EA 2011 - 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Proceedings and Extended Abstracts

Y2 - 7 May 2011 through 12 May 2011

ER -

Squeeze vs. tilt: A comparative study using continuous tactile feedback

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this