TY - JOUR
T1 - Planning with Climate Change?
T2 - A Poststructuralist Approach to Climate Change Adaptation
AU - Dujardin, Sébastien
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by an FRIA grant from the Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research (FRS-FNRS). I warmly thank my thesis supervisor Professor N. Dendoncker (UNamur) and the anonymous reviewers for their many helpful comments and suggestions. This work also largely benefited from multiple conversations with Professor M. Pelling (King?s College London) and M. Garschagen (HNU-IEHS), who greatly influenced the orientation of my epistemological stance. An earlier version of this article was presented at the 2014 Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers during the session ?Climate Change: Planning, Policy and Practice I: Role of the People.? All flaws remain my own.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 by American Association of Geographers.
PY - 2020/7/3
Y1 - 2020/7/3
N2 - This article calls for a stronger engagement by geographers with the concept of socionature as a vehicle for guiding adaptation thinking in development planning. Drawing on literatures from poststructuralist geographies, it argues for a relational, hybrid ontology of climate change adaptation grounded in multiple perspectives, knowledges, and more-than-human relations. Going beyond this stance, a framework based on the idea of planning with climate change is proposed for a revised approach to adaptation that calls for more-than-social planning practices embedded in radically more integrative planning processes and the redistribution of power across the climate and planning systems. The article ends by highlighting some of the key challenges that such a project faces for scholars working in the field of planning and development research. Key Words: climate change adaptation, development, human geography, planning, poststructuralist theory.
AB - This article calls for a stronger engagement by geographers with the concept of socionature as a vehicle for guiding adaptation thinking in development planning. Drawing on literatures from poststructuralist geographies, it argues for a relational, hybrid ontology of climate change adaptation grounded in multiple perspectives, knowledges, and more-than-human relations. Going beyond this stance, a framework based on the idea of planning with climate change is proposed for a revised approach to adaptation that calls for more-than-social planning practices embedded in radically more integrative planning processes and the redistribution of power across the climate and planning systems. The article ends by highlighting some of the key challenges that such a project faces for scholars working in the field of planning and development research. Key Words: climate change adaptation, development, human geography, planning, poststructuralist theory.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074458017&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/24694452.2019.1664888
DO - 10.1080/24694452.2019.1664888
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85074458017
SN - 2469-4452
VL - 110
SP - 1059
EP - 1074
JO - Annals of the American Association of Geographers
JF - Annals of the American Association of Geographers
IS - 4
ER -