Party nomination strategies in flexible-list systems: Do preference votes matter for realistic list positions?

G.-J. Put, J. Smulders, B. Maddens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Previous studies on flexible-list systems demonstrate that party selectorates promote candidates with a high number of preference votes to better list positions in the next election. This research note asks whether these rank promotions are limited to candidates in unrealistic list positions at the lower end of the ballot or also include candidates moving into realistic list positions (i.e. electorally safer highest ranks). Using a longitudinal data set of candidates for 18 parliamentary elections in Flanders (Belgium), we first successfully replicate the earlier established preference vote-effect on future list positions, but subsequently show that promotions from unrealistic to realistic positions are relatively rare. Moreover, preference votes do not seem to affect the ability to move upwards on the list or to receive a realistic position at the next election when controlling for incumbency and list position at the previous election. Robustness tests using different operationalizations for realistic position lead to similar empirical results. Preference votes do not seem to matter for realistic list positions.
Original languageEnglish
JournalParty Politics
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Jul 2019

Keywords

  • Belgium
  • flexible-list systems
  • nomination strategies

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Party nomination strategies in flexible-list systems: Do preference votes matter for realistic list positions?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this