Projects per year
We test the consistency with which Simmons’ model can predict the local current density obtained for flat metal-vacuum-metal junctions. The image potential energy used in Simmons’ original papers had a missing factor of 1/2. Beside this technical issue, Simmons’ model relies on a mean-barrier approximation for electron transmission through the potential-energy barrier between the metals. In order to test Simmons’ expression for the local current density when the correct image potential energy is included, we compare the results of this expression with those provided by a transfer-matrix technique. We also consider the current densities provided by a numerical integration of the transmission probability obtained with the WKB approximation and Simmons’ mean-barrier approximation. The comparison between these different models shows that Simmons’ expression for the local current density actually provides results that are in good agreement with those provided by the transfer-matrix technique, for a range of conditions of practical interest. We show that Simmons’ model provides good results in the linear and field-emission regimes of current density versus voltage plots. It loses its applicability when the top of the potential-energy barrier drops below the Fermi level of the emitting metal.
|Number of pages||15|
|Journal||Jordan Journal of Physics|
|Publication status||Published - 1 Jan 2019|
- Field electron emission
- Mean-barrier approximation
- Metal-vacuum-metal junction
- Transfer-matrix technique
- Transmission probability
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Numerical testing by a transfer-matrix technique of Simmons' equation for the local current density in metal-vacuum-metal junctions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- 1 Active
CHAMPAGNE, B., Lazzaroni, R., Geuzaine , C., Chatelain, P. & Knaepen, B.
1/01/18 → 31/12/22