Metadata quality matters in Open Government Data (OGD) evaluation! An empirical investigation of OGD portals of the GCC constituents: An empirical investigation of OGD portals of the GCC constituents

Abiola Paterne Chokki, Charalampos Alexopoulos, Stuti Saxena, Benoît Frénay, Benoit Vanderose, Mohsan Ali

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

65 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: The study seeks to investigate the quality of metadata associated with the open government data (OGD) portals of the six Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) constituents – Bahrain (BH), Kuwait (KW), Oman (OM), Qatar (QA), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and United Arab Emirates (UAE). Design/methodology/approach: A quantitative framework, supported by extant literature, is adopted to assess the metadata quality of the six OGD portals of the GCC constituents. Findings: Among the six GCC countries, QA has the most advanced OGD metadata quality followed by KSA, UAE, OM, BH and KW. Furthermore, the OGD metadata quality (MQ) of UAE and OM stand at the same pedestal whereas BH and KW OGD portals are lagging behind. Originality/value: While the OGD quality has been investigated in extant literature, the MQ of the OGD portals for the GCC countries has not been investigated so far – the present study seeks to plug this gap.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)303-316
Number of pages14
JournalTransforming Government: People, Process and Policy
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Oct 2023

Keywords

  • Open Government Data
  • OGD
  • Open Data
  • Metadata
  • Evaluation
  • Gulf Cooperation Council
  • Open government data (OGD)
  • Open data

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Metadata quality matters in Open Government Data (OGD) evaluation! An empirical investigation of OGD portals of the GCC constituents: An empirical investigation of OGD portals of the GCC constituents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this