Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election

Alexandre Bovet, Hernan A. Makse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The dynamics and influence of fake news on Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election remains to be clarified. Here, we use a dataset of 171 million tweets in the five months preceding the election day to identify 30 million tweets, from 2.2 million users, which contain a link to news outlets. Based on a classification of news outlets curated by www.opensources.co, we find that 25% of these tweets spread either fake or extremely biased news. We characterize the networks of information flow to find the most influential spreaders of fake and traditional news and use causal modeling to uncover how fake news influenced the presidential election. We find that, while top influencers spreading traditional center and left leaning news largely influence the activity of Clinton supporters, this causality is reversed for the fake news: the activity of Trump supporters influences the dynamics of the top fake news spreaders.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7
Pages (from-to)7
Number of pages7
JournalNature Communications
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Spreaders
news
Information Services
Causality
outlets
information flow
Datasets

Cite this

@article{0e212c961f3d4ac587288d15a0be1c76,
title = "Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election",
abstract = "The dynamics and influence of fake news on Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election remains to be clarified. Here, we use a dataset of 171 million tweets in the five months preceding the election day to identify 30 million tweets, from 2.2 million users, which contain a link to news outlets. Based on a classification of news outlets curated by www.opensources.co, we find that 25{\%} of these tweets spread either fake or extremely biased news. We characterize the networks of information flow to find the most influential spreaders of fake and traditional news and use causal modeling to uncover how fake news influenced the presidential election. We find that, while top influencers spreading traditional center and left leaning news largely influence the activity of Clinton supporters, this causality is reversed for the fake news: the activity of Trump supporters influences the dynamics of the top fake news spreaders.",
author = "Alexandre Bovet and Makse, {Hernan A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1038/s41467-018-07761-2",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "7",
journal = "Nature Communications",
issn = "2041-1723",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election. / Bovet, Alexandre; Makse, Hernan A.

In: Nature Communications, Vol. 10, No. 1, 7, 02.01.2019, p. 7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election

AU - Bovet, Alexandre

AU - Makse, Hernan A.

PY - 2019/1/2

Y1 - 2019/1/2

N2 - The dynamics and influence of fake news on Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election remains to be clarified. Here, we use a dataset of 171 million tweets in the five months preceding the election day to identify 30 million tweets, from 2.2 million users, which contain a link to news outlets. Based on a classification of news outlets curated by www.opensources.co, we find that 25% of these tweets spread either fake or extremely biased news. We characterize the networks of information flow to find the most influential spreaders of fake and traditional news and use causal modeling to uncover how fake news influenced the presidential election. We find that, while top influencers spreading traditional center and left leaning news largely influence the activity of Clinton supporters, this causality is reversed for the fake news: the activity of Trump supporters influences the dynamics of the top fake news spreaders.

AB - The dynamics and influence of fake news on Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election remains to be clarified. Here, we use a dataset of 171 million tweets in the five months preceding the election day to identify 30 million tweets, from 2.2 million users, which contain a link to news outlets. Based on a classification of news outlets curated by www.opensources.co, we find that 25% of these tweets spread either fake or extremely biased news. We characterize the networks of information flow to find the most influential spreaders of fake and traditional news and use causal modeling to uncover how fake news influenced the presidential election. We find that, while top influencers spreading traditional center and left leaning news largely influence the activity of Clinton supporters, this causality is reversed for the fake news: the activity of Trump supporters influences the dynamics of the top fake news spreaders.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059494932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41467-018-07761-2

DO - 10.1038/s41467-018-07761-2

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 7

JO - Nature Communications

JF - Nature Communications

SN - 2041-1723

IS - 1

M1 - 7

ER -