Abstract
to inform chemical regulation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Biological Reviews |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 12 Oct 2024 |
Funding
This article was conceived at a workshop organised by the German Environment Agency (UBA) and financed by UBA and by Stockholm University. The authors thank Jason Magnuson (U.S. Geological Survey, USGS), Chris Kotalik (USGS), Meredith Nevers (USGS), Kimberly Jarema (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, US EPA), Gerald Ankley (US EPA), and Susan Cormier (US EPA) for their comments on the manuscript. We also thank the following agencies for financial support: the Swedish Research Council Formas (2020-02293 to M.G.B.; 2018-00828 to T.B.; 2022-02796 to J.M.M; 2022-00503 to M.M.), the Kempe Foundations (SMK-1954 and SMK21-0069 to M.G.B.; JCK22-0037 to T.B.), the Marie-Claire Cronstedt Foundation (to M.G.B.), the Australian Research Council (FT190100014, DP190100642, and DP220100245 to B.B.M.W.), the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (1P01ES028942 to B.W.B.), and the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sk\u0142odowska Curie grant agreement (101061889 to M.M). The authors have no competing financial interests to declare. The EthoCRED evaluation method for behavioural ecotoxicity studies was formulated by a group of 35 experts, having originally been conceived at a workshop organised by the German Environment Agency (UBA) and Stockholm University, titled \u201CThe behaviour of non\u2010target organisms after exposure to chemicals: possibilities of implementation in the regulatory process\u201D. This group of experts includes academic researchers working across the fields of behavioural ecology, ecotoxicology, aquatic and terrestrial ecology, environmental science, chemical regulation, risk assessment, and risk management. It also includes experts from a range of governmental institutions and agencies, including the German Environment Agency (UBA), the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), the Swedish Chemicals Agency (KemI), the Office of Research and Development (ORD) within the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM, the Netherlands), and the Environment Protection Authority Victoria (EPA, Australia). When devising the EthoCRED evaluation method, the CRED method (Moermond ., 2016 ) was used as a foundation, and was chosen since it is already recommended for use in the EU Water Framework Directive (European Commission, 2018 ). Certain CRED evaluation criteria remained unchanged (i.e. have no behaviour\u2010specific guidance), while others were modified to fit the specific characteristics of behavioural studies, with additional behaviour\u2010specific criteria and reporting recommendations also being added. et al This article was conceived at a workshop organised by the German Environment Agency (UBA) and financed by UBA and by Stockholm University. The authors thank Jason Magnuson (U.S. Geological Survey, USGS), Chris Kotalik (USGS), Meredith Nevers (USGS), Kimberly Jarema (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, US EPA), Gerald Ankley (US EPA), and Susan Cormier (US EPA) for their comments on the manuscript. We also thank the following agencies for financial support: the Swedish Research Council Formas (2020\u201002293 to M.G.B.; 2018\u201000828 to T.B.; 2022\u201002796 to J.M.M; 2022\u201000503 to M.M.), the Kempe Foundations (SMK\u20101954 and SMK21\u20100069 to M.G.B.; JCK22\u20100037 to T.B.), the Marie\u2010Claire Cronstedt Foundation (to M.G.B.), the Australian Research Council (FT190100014, DP190100642, and DP220100245 to B.B.M.W.), the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (1P01ES028942 to B.W.B.), and the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sk\u0142odowska Curie grant agreement (101061889 to M.M). The authors have no competing financial interests to declare.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Stockholms Universitet | |
Susan Cormier | |
U.S. Geological Survey | |
Universidad de Buenos Aires | |
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment | |
Office of Research and Development | |
Umweltbundesamt | |
Marie-Claire Cronstedts Stiftelse | |
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences | |
Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu | |
Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung | |
Environment Protection Authority Victoria | |
German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment | |
Office of Research and Development, University of Botswana | |
Swedish Chemicals Agency | |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency | |
Jason Magnuson | |
Australian Research Council | DP220100245, DP190100642, FT190100014 |
National Institutes of Health | 1P01ES028942 |
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas | 2020‐02293, 2018‐00828, 2022‐02796, 2022‐00503 |
European Commission | 101061889 |
Kempestiftelserna | SMK‐1954, SMK21‐0069, JCK22‐0037 |
Keywords
- behaviour
- chemical regulation
- data evaluation
- hazard assessment
- policy
- pollution
- population relevance
- reliability evaluation
- risk assessment