Ecosystem disservices matter: Towards their systematic integration within ecosystem service research and policy

Julien Blanco, Nicolas Dendoncker, Cécile Barnaud, Clélia Sirami

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Ecosystem disservices (EDS) highlight the negative effects of nature on human well-being. Like ecosystem services (ES), EDS impact economic and non-economic aspects of human life within social-ecological systems (SES). The concept of EDS has been much debated, with strongly differing opinions regarding its utility and implications. In this opinion paper, we emphasize its relevance and complementarity to the ES concept for analyzing SES, and advocate applying EDS to SES research more systematically. Firstly, we highlight that though EDS are now sometimes studied, they remain neglected compared to ES. Secondly, we propose five reasons why EDS and ES are complementary concepts. Thirdly, we suggest that EDS are critical to understanding stakeholders’ behavior regarding ecosystems. Drawing on existing studies, we illustrate how stakeholders in SES simultaneously perceive and benefit or suffer from ES and EDS. We further suggest that, under certain conditions, EDS may influence people's behavior more than ES. Such ‘EDS-biased behavior’ implies that, under certain circumstances, targeting EDS reduction may be more effective than targeting ES increase to encourage nature-friendly behaviors. Finally, we provide five recommendations to further integrate ES and EDS in research, as a pathway towards improving the understanding of SES and the effectiveness of sustainability policies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100913
Number of pages4
JournalEcosystem Services
Volume36
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

ecosystem service
ecosystem services
Ecosystem
ecological system
social system
ecosystems
ecosystem
Research
stakeholder
policy
stakeholders
targeting
systems research
economic impact
well-being
sustainability
complementarity

Keywords

  • Decision-making
  • Human-nature relationships
  • Integrated valuation
  • Policy for sustainability
  • Socio-cultural valuation

Cite this

@article{2303bb065f1b48b692ba472afcbc6a2d,
title = "Ecosystem disservices matter: Towards their systematic integration within ecosystem service research and policy",
abstract = "Ecosystem disservices (EDS) highlight the negative effects of nature on human well-being. Like ecosystem services (ES), EDS impact economic and non-economic aspects of human life within social-ecological systems (SES). The concept of EDS has been much debated, with strongly differing opinions regarding its utility and implications. In this opinion paper, we emphasize its relevance and complementarity to the ES concept for analyzing SES, and advocate applying EDS to SES research more systematically. Firstly, we highlight that though EDS are now sometimes studied, they remain neglected compared to ES. Secondly, we propose five reasons why EDS and ES are complementary concepts. Thirdly, we suggest that EDS are critical to understanding stakeholders’ behavior regarding ecosystems. Drawing on existing studies, we illustrate how stakeholders in SES simultaneously perceive and benefit or suffer from ES and EDS. We further suggest that, under certain conditions, EDS may influence people's behavior more than ES. Such ‘EDS-biased behavior’ implies that, under certain circumstances, targeting EDS reduction may be more effective than targeting ES increase to encourage nature-friendly behaviors. Finally, we provide five recommendations to further integrate ES and EDS in research, as a pathway towards improving the understanding of SES and the effectiveness of sustainability policies.",
keywords = "Decision-making, Human-nature relationships, Integrated valuation, Policy for sustainability, Socio-cultural valuation",
author = "Julien Blanco and Nicolas Dendoncker and C{\'e}cile Barnaud and Cl{\'e}lia Sirami",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100913",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
journal = "Ecosystem Services",
issn = "2212-0416",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Ecosystem disservices matter : Towards their systematic integration within ecosystem service research and policy. / Blanco, Julien; Dendoncker, Nicolas; Barnaud, Cécile; Sirami, Clélia.

In: Ecosystem Services, Vol. 36, 100913, 01.04.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ecosystem disservices matter

T2 - Towards their systematic integration within ecosystem service research and policy

AU - Blanco, Julien

AU - Dendoncker, Nicolas

AU - Barnaud, Cécile

AU - Sirami, Clélia

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Ecosystem disservices (EDS) highlight the negative effects of nature on human well-being. Like ecosystem services (ES), EDS impact economic and non-economic aspects of human life within social-ecological systems (SES). The concept of EDS has been much debated, with strongly differing opinions regarding its utility and implications. In this opinion paper, we emphasize its relevance and complementarity to the ES concept for analyzing SES, and advocate applying EDS to SES research more systematically. Firstly, we highlight that though EDS are now sometimes studied, they remain neglected compared to ES. Secondly, we propose five reasons why EDS and ES are complementary concepts. Thirdly, we suggest that EDS are critical to understanding stakeholders’ behavior regarding ecosystems. Drawing on existing studies, we illustrate how stakeholders in SES simultaneously perceive and benefit or suffer from ES and EDS. We further suggest that, under certain conditions, EDS may influence people's behavior more than ES. Such ‘EDS-biased behavior’ implies that, under certain circumstances, targeting EDS reduction may be more effective than targeting ES increase to encourage nature-friendly behaviors. Finally, we provide five recommendations to further integrate ES and EDS in research, as a pathway towards improving the understanding of SES and the effectiveness of sustainability policies.

AB - Ecosystem disservices (EDS) highlight the negative effects of nature on human well-being. Like ecosystem services (ES), EDS impact economic and non-economic aspects of human life within social-ecological systems (SES). The concept of EDS has been much debated, with strongly differing opinions regarding its utility and implications. In this opinion paper, we emphasize its relevance and complementarity to the ES concept for analyzing SES, and advocate applying EDS to SES research more systematically. Firstly, we highlight that though EDS are now sometimes studied, they remain neglected compared to ES. Secondly, we propose five reasons why EDS and ES are complementary concepts. Thirdly, we suggest that EDS are critical to understanding stakeholders’ behavior regarding ecosystems. Drawing on existing studies, we illustrate how stakeholders in SES simultaneously perceive and benefit or suffer from ES and EDS. We further suggest that, under certain conditions, EDS may influence people's behavior more than ES. Such ‘EDS-biased behavior’ implies that, under certain circumstances, targeting EDS reduction may be more effective than targeting ES increase to encourage nature-friendly behaviors. Finally, we provide five recommendations to further integrate ES and EDS in research, as a pathway towards improving the understanding of SES and the effectiveness of sustainability policies.

KW - Decision-making

KW - Human-nature relationships

KW - Integrated valuation

KW - Policy for sustainability

KW - Socio-cultural valuation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062843105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100913

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100913

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85062843105

VL - 36

JO - Ecosystem Services

JF - Ecosystem Services

SN - 2212-0416

M1 - 100913

ER -