Continuous lighting inhibits the onset of reproductive cycle in pikeperch males and females

I. Ben Ammar, F. Teletchea, S. Milla, W. N. Ndiaye, Y. Ledoré, H. Missaoui, P. Fontaine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


The effect of a constant photoperiod on the inhibition of male and female reproductive cycles was studied in pikeperch Sander lucioperca. Over a 153-day period, batches of pikeperch (2 years, 950 g) breeders were kept under either under natural or artificial photoperiod conditions (24L:0D) (30–35 fish/tank, triplicate) and sampled in late June (start of the photoperiod decrease in natural conditions), late August (start of temperature decrease) and late November (exogenous vitellogenesis) (7–10 fish/tank/sampling date). Morphological parameters, sexual steroids, alkaline-labile phosphate (µg/mL) levels and gamete developmental stages were investigated. Gonado-somatic index (%), developmental stages and sexual steroid levels (17β-estradiol, testosterone and 11-ketotestosterone, ng/mL) in both sexes and oocyte diameter (µm) and plasma alkaline-labile phosphate (µg/mL) in females were lower in response to a continuous lighting (24L:0D). In both sexes, continuous lighting applied in June for 153 days totally inhibited or delayed the onset of the reproductive cycle. In conclusion, photoperiod manipulation can be used to delay the pikeperch reproductive cycle, even if temperature decreases. This is the first report of the inhibitory effect of photoperiod on the onset of the reproductive cycle in pikeperch.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)345-356
Number of pages12
JournalFish Physiology and Biochemistry
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015
Externally publishedYes


  • Continuous lighting
  • Onset of reproductive cycle
  • Photoperiod
  • Pikeperch

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Continuous lighting inhibits the onset of reproductive cycle in pikeperch males and females'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this