Comparison between new and old generation RetroX® auditory implants

J. P. Van Damme, J. Jamart, Pierre Garin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To compare post aural soft tissues tolerance of the old and new titanium RetroX® (Auric GmbH, Rheine, Germany) tube, and to compare the hearing improvements between the old (DSP-pro®) and the new (Concertino®) hearing aid units of the RetroX. Methodology: Retrospective case review of 46 patients with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss, fitted with DSP-pro or Concertino, and who received 51 implantations (with the old or new generation titanium tube) in a tertiary referral center at a university hospital. The RetroX consists of an electronic unit situated in the postaural sulcus connected to a titanium tube implanted under the auricle between the sulcus and the external auditory meatus. Implanting requires minor surgery (10 minutes under local anaesthesia). Three months after their implantation, patients were asked to fill out a questionnaire to evaluate acoustic feedback annoyance and to undergo 3 audiometric tests: pure-tone audiometry in silence, speech audiometry in silence, and speech audiometry in noise. Results: The new tube is more reliable (12 explantations from patients who received 26 older tubes compared with 1 explantation in 25 who received new tubes) even if the size must be adjusted more often (2/26 for the old model and 5/25 for the new one). Concertino allows a higher amplification before feedback appears, which improves hearing gain. Conclusions: The new RetroX is better tolerated than the older one, and improves hearing ability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalB-ENT
Volume6
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Audition
Titanium
Speech Audiometry
Hearing
audiometry
hearing
tubes
High-Frequency Hearing Loss
Pure-Tone Audiometry
Minor Surgical Procedures
Aptitude
Hearing Aids
titanium
Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Local Anesthesia
Hearing aids
Feedback
Acoustics
Tertiary Care Centers
Germany

Keywords

  • Acoustic feedback
  • High-frequency hearing loss
  • Implantable hearing aid
  • Open ear canal hearing aid
  • RetroX®

Cite this

@article{dc17cbc174494953877ac8592389ba06,
title = "Comparison between new and old generation RetroX{\circledR} auditory implants",
abstract = "Objective: To compare post aural soft tissues tolerance of the old and new titanium RetroX{\circledR} (Auric GmbH, Rheine, Germany) tube, and to compare the hearing improvements between the old (DSP-pro{\circledR}) and the new (Concertino{\circledR}) hearing aid units of the RetroX. Methodology: Retrospective case review of 46 patients with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss, fitted with DSP-pro or Concertino, and who received 51 implantations (with the old or new generation titanium tube) in a tertiary referral center at a university hospital. The RetroX consists of an electronic unit situated in the postaural sulcus connected to a titanium tube implanted under the auricle between the sulcus and the external auditory meatus. Implanting requires minor surgery (10 minutes under local anaesthesia). Three months after their implantation, patients were asked to fill out a questionnaire to evaluate acoustic feedback annoyance and to undergo 3 audiometric tests: pure-tone audiometry in silence, speech audiometry in silence, and speech audiometry in noise. Results: The new tube is more reliable (12 explantations from patients who received 26 older tubes compared with 1 explantation in 25 who received new tubes) even if the size must be adjusted more often (2/26 for the old model and 5/25 for the new one). Concertino allows a higher amplification before feedback appears, which improves hearing gain. Conclusions: The new RetroX is better tolerated than the older one, and improves hearing ability.",
keywords = "Acoustic feedback, High-frequency hearing loss, Implantable hearing aid, Open ear canal hearing aid, RetroX{\circledR}",
author = "{Van Damme}, {J. P.} and J. Jamart and Pierre Garin",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics",
issn = "2469-9950",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "1",

}

Comparison between new and old generation RetroX® auditory implants. / Van Damme, J. P.; Jamart, J.; Garin, Pierre.

In: B-ENT, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.03.2010, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison between new and old generation RetroX® auditory implants

AU - Van Damme, J. P.

AU - Jamart, J.

AU - Garin, Pierre

PY - 2010/3/1

Y1 - 2010/3/1

N2 - Objective: To compare post aural soft tissues tolerance of the old and new titanium RetroX® (Auric GmbH, Rheine, Germany) tube, and to compare the hearing improvements between the old (DSP-pro®) and the new (Concertino®) hearing aid units of the RetroX. Methodology: Retrospective case review of 46 patients with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss, fitted with DSP-pro or Concertino, and who received 51 implantations (with the old or new generation titanium tube) in a tertiary referral center at a university hospital. The RetroX consists of an electronic unit situated in the postaural sulcus connected to a titanium tube implanted under the auricle between the sulcus and the external auditory meatus. Implanting requires minor surgery (10 minutes under local anaesthesia). Three months after their implantation, patients were asked to fill out a questionnaire to evaluate acoustic feedback annoyance and to undergo 3 audiometric tests: pure-tone audiometry in silence, speech audiometry in silence, and speech audiometry in noise. Results: The new tube is more reliable (12 explantations from patients who received 26 older tubes compared with 1 explantation in 25 who received new tubes) even if the size must be adjusted more often (2/26 for the old model and 5/25 for the new one). Concertino allows a higher amplification before feedback appears, which improves hearing gain. Conclusions: The new RetroX is better tolerated than the older one, and improves hearing ability.

AB - Objective: To compare post aural soft tissues tolerance of the old and new titanium RetroX® (Auric GmbH, Rheine, Germany) tube, and to compare the hearing improvements between the old (DSP-pro®) and the new (Concertino®) hearing aid units of the RetroX. Methodology: Retrospective case review of 46 patients with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss, fitted with DSP-pro or Concertino, and who received 51 implantations (with the old or new generation titanium tube) in a tertiary referral center at a university hospital. The RetroX consists of an electronic unit situated in the postaural sulcus connected to a titanium tube implanted under the auricle between the sulcus and the external auditory meatus. Implanting requires minor surgery (10 minutes under local anaesthesia). Three months after their implantation, patients were asked to fill out a questionnaire to evaluate acoustic feedback annoyance and to undergo 3 audiometric tests: pure-tone audiometry in silence, speech audiometry in silence, and speech audiometry in noise. Results: The new tube is more reliable (12 explantations from patients who received 26 older tubes compared with 1 explantation in 25 who received new tubes) even if the size must be adjusted more often (2/26 for the old model and 5/25 for the new one). Concertino allows a higher amplification before feedback appears, which improves hearing gain. Conclusions: The new RetroX is better tolerated than the older one, and improves hearing ability.

KW - Acoustic feedback

KW - High-frequency hearing loss

KW - Implantable hearing aid

KW - Open ear canal hearing aid

KW - RetroX®

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952307035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

JF - Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

SN - 2469-9950

IS - 1

ER -