Capturing multiple social perspectives on adaptation across scales: a Q-method analysis of actors from development planning in the Philippines

S. Dujardin, Françoise Orban-Ferauge, Michael P. Cañares, N. Dendoncker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper describes and analyses viewpoints regarding climate change adaptation held among key social actors from the field of development planning in the Philippines. Four empirically significant social perspectives are determined – institutional, grassroots, developmental, and physical planning – using Q-method, an intensive qualitative and quantitative technique. Major differences and commonalities between perspectives are highlighted, in addition to actors’ arguments used to justify claims. Drawing upon an actor-oriented approach, results contribute filling a knowledge gap in the literature on the need to develop approaches that can guide adaptation thinking in development planning. While the four perspectives identified provide evidence that differentiated viewpoints on climate change and planning practices may lead to divergent adaptation strategies, commonalities among social perspectives suggest that shared adaptations may also emerge both among actors from multiple organizational structures and across the organisational hierarchy of planning. By building learning processes that include multiple social perspectives across scales, development planning can become a promising candidate for strengthening adaptive capacities and delivering more effective responses to climate change.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1-13
Number of pages13
JournalClimate and Development
DOIs
StatePublished - 24 Mar 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

development planning
analysis
method
Philippines
climate change
planning
planning practice
learning
climate change adaptation
physical planning
knowledge gap
social actor
organizational structure
learning process
candidacy
evidence
literature

Keywords

  • Bohol
  • climate change adaptation
  • development planning
  • Philippines
  • Q-method
  • social perspectives

Cite this

@article{889c292b850d4d41a77b3bd19dd4eb18,
title = "Capturing multiple social perspectives on adaptation across scales: a Q-method analysis of actors from development planning in the Philippines",
abstract = "This paper describes and analyses viewpoints regarding climate change adaptation held among key social actors from the field of development planning in the Philippines. Four empirically significant social perspectives are determined – institutional, grassroots, developmental, and physical planning – using Q-method, an intensive qualitative and quantitative technique. Major differences and commonalities between perspectives are highlighted, in addition to actors’ arguments used to justify claims. Drawing upon an actor-oriented approach, results contribute filling a knowledge gap in the literature on the need to develop approaches that can guide adaptation thinking in development planning. While the four perspectives identified provide evidence that differentiated viewpoints on climate change and planning practices may lead to divergent adaptation strategies, commonalities among social perspectives suggest that shared adaptations may also emerge both among actors from multiple organizational structures and across the organisational hierarchy of planning. By building learning processes that include multiple social perspectives across scales, development planning can become a promising candidate for strengthening adaptive capacities and delivering more effective responses to climate change.",
keywords = "Bohol, climate change adaptation, development planning, Philippines, Q-method, social perspectives",
author = "S. Dujardin and Fran\{cc}oise Orban-Ferauge and Ca\{~n}ares, {Michael P.} and N. Dendoncker",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1080/17565529.2017.1301863",
language = "English",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "Climate and Development",
issn = "1756-5529",
publisher = "Earthscan Ltd.",

}

Capturing multiple social perspectives on adaptation across scales : a Q-method analysis of actors from development planning in the Philippines. / Dujardin, S.; Orban-Ferauge, Françoise; Cañares, Michael P.; Dendoncker, N.

In: Climate and Development, 24.03.2017, p. 1-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Capturing multiple social perspectives on adaptation across scales

T2 - Climate and Development

AU - Dujardin,S.

AU - Orban-Ferauge,Françoise

AU - Cañares,Michael P.

AU - Dendoncker,N.

PY - 2017/3/24

Y1 - 2017/3/24

N2 - This paper describes and analyses viewpoints regarding climate change adaptation held among key social actors from the field of development planning in the Philippines. Four empirically significant social perspectives are determined – institutional, grassroots, developmental, and physical planning – using Q-method, an intensive qualitative and quantitative technique. Major differences and commonalities between perspectives are highlighted, in addition to actors’ arguments used to justify claims. Drawing upon an actor-oriented approach, results contribute filling a knowledge gap in the literature on the need to develop approaches that can guide adaptation thinking in development planning. While the four perspectives identified provide evidence that differentiated viewpoints on climate change and planning practices may lead to divergent adaptation strategies, commonalities among social perspectives suggest that shared adaptations may also emerge both among actors from multiple organizational structures and across the organisational hierarchy of planning. By building learning processes that include multiple social perspectives across scales, development planning can become a promising candidate for strengthening adaptive capacities and delivering more effective responses to climate change.

AB - This paper describes and analyses viewpoints regarding climate change adaptation held among key social actors from the field of development planning in the Philippines. Four empirically significant social perspectives are determined – institutional, grassroots, developmental, and physical planning – using Q-method, an intensive qualitative and quantitative technique. Major differences and commonalities between perspectives are highlighted, in addition to actors’ arguments used to justify claims. Drawing upon an actor-oriented approach, results contribute filling a knowledge gap in the literature on the need to develop approaches that can guide adaptation thinking in development planning. While the four perspectives identified provide evidence that differentiated viewpoints on climate change and planning practices may lead to divergent adaptation strategies, commonalities among social perspectives suggest that shared adaptations may also emerge both among actors from multiple organizational structures and across the organisational hierarchy of planning. By building learning processes that include multiple social perspectives across scales, development planning can become a promising candidate for strengthening adaptive capacities and delivering more effective responses to climate change.

KW - Bohol

KW - climate change adaptation

KW - development planning

KW - Philippines

KW - Q-method

KW - social perspectives

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016203099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301863

DO - 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301863

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Climate and Development

JF - Climate and Development

SN - 1756-5529

ER -