@article{32da4a1b16544d888ed0e1bce2cb2df7,
title = "A biocodicological analysis of the medieval library and archive from Orval Abbey, Belgium",
abstract = "Biocodicological analysis of parchments from manuscript books and archives offers unprecedented insight into the materiality of medieval literacy. Using ZooMS for animal species identification, we explored almost the entire library and all the preserved single leaf charters of a single medieval Cistercian monastery (Orval Abbey, Belgium). Systematic non-invasive sampling of parchment collagen was performed on every charter and on the first bifolium from every quire of the 118 codicological units composing the books (1490 samples in total). Within the genuine production of the Orval scriptorium (26 units), a balanced use of calfskin (47.1%) and sheepskin (48.5%) was observed, whereas calfskin was less frequent (24.3%) in externally produced units acquired by the monastery (92 units). Calfskin was preferably used for higher quality manuscripts while sheepskin tends to be the standard choice for {\textquoteleft}ordinary{\textquoteright} manuscript book production. This finding is consistent with thirteenth-century parchment accounts from Beaulieu Abbey (England) where calfskin supply was more limited and its price higher. Our study reveals that the making of archival documents does not follow the same pattern as the production of library books. Although the five earliest preserved charters are made of calfskin, from the 1230s onwards, all charters from Orval are written on sheepskin.",
keywords = "manuscripts, charters, parchment, collagen, mass spectrometry",
author = "Nicolas RUFFINI-RONZANI and Jean-Francois Nieus and Silvia Soncin and Simon Hickinbotham and Marc DIEU and Julie Bouhy and Catherine Charles and Chiara Ruzzier and Thomas Falmagne and Xavier Hermand and Collins, {Matthew J.} and Olivier Deparis",
note = "Funding Information: Data accessibility. The datasets supporting this article have been uploaded as part of the electronic supplementary material. Authors{\textquoteright} contributions. X.H., J.-F.N., T.F., M.J.C., O.D. conceived the study; T.F. realized the codicological study; C.C. organized parchment sampling; S.S., M.D., J.B. performed ZooMS analysis; S.S. (S.H.) conducted manual (automated) species identification; O.D. wrote dedicated scripts for statistical analysis; N.R.-R., J.-F.N., C.R., X.H. carried out the historical interpretation of the results; N.R.-R., J.-F.N., M.J.C., O.D. wrote the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication and agree to be held accountable for the work performed therein. Competing interests. At the time of writing, Prof. Matthew Collins was a Board Member of Royal Society Open Science, but had no involvement in the review or assessment of the paper. Funding. O.D. acknowledges funding from the Fondation Roi Baudouin, Belgium (Fonds Jean-Jacques Comhaire, Grant Agreement No. 2016-P2813310-206264). M.J.C. acknowledges funding from Beasts to Craft (ERC Horizon 2020 Grant Agreement No. 787282) as well as Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF128). Acknowledgements. The authors acknowledge funding from the Fondation Roi Baudouin, Belgium (Fonds Jean-Jacques Comhaire). They are grateful to the National Library of Luxembourg and the Belgian State Archives for granting access to their collections. O.D. thanks Luke Spindler (BioArCh, University of York) for ZooMS analyses on very first samples. O.D., J.-F.N., N.R.-R. thank J. Vnoucek for enlightening discussion on parchment fabrication and visual inspection. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Authors.",
year = "2021",
month = jun,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1098/rsos.210210",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Royal Society Open Science",
issn = "2054-5703",
publisher = "The Royal Society",
number = "6",
}